I've seen tthat some poeple posted edits of A.I generated art. I know that this site isnt allowing any A.I stuff with excdeptions.
Is editing ai art fine now or not?
Posted under General
NigBreaker said:
Doesn't it stand to reason that AI art that's been manually edited or captioned should be just fine?
The only difference between AI art and "real" art at that point is the proportion of manual labour compared to what's been automated.
Yes, but IMO the issue is because AI art requires much less labor, it also means there is far much less investment into making it so it can be churned out so fast that human quality control cant really keep up with it so you'll just have spammed amounts of AI art that is 90% of the pictures, vs someone who draws the art themselves having years of investment in practicing so the level of entry being way higher. I don't really have a problem with talented artists using AI. It's more the fact that almost anyone can do it so it increases spam.
fkiblaze said:
Yes, but IMO the issue is because AI art requires much less labor, it also means there is far much less investment into making it so it can be churned out so fast that human quality control cant really keep up with it so you'll just have spammed amounts of AI art that is 90% of the pictures, vs someone who draws the art themselves having years of investment in practicing so the level of entry being way higher. I don't really have a problem with talented artists using AI. It's more the fact that almost anyone can do it so it increases spam.
That really doesn't have anything to do with AI in itself though, the issue in that scenario is the user who's spamming the site regardless of what they're spamming.
NigBreaker said:
Doesn't it stand to reason that AI art that's been manually edited or captioned should be just fine?
The only difference between AI art and "real" art at that point is the proportion of manual labour compared to what's been automated.
There is a difference, even if the line grows blurry at times it’s still easy to spot AI generated imagery.
And I will be dead and buried before AI can create anything comparable to human creativity.
The only “”difference”” is fucking all of it. Bite me
NigBreaker said:
That really doesn't have anything to do with AI in itself though, the issue in that scenario is the user who's spamming the site regardless of what they're spamming.
Yes except the amount of spam someone can upload of their own art vs the amount of spam they can upload as AI art they made is vastly different in 99.9% of the cases. If you mean them uploading art someone else made, then sure you can spam as much, but that can easily be solved by just making a rule against them uploading art they didnt make.
fkiblaze said:
Yes except the amount of spam someone can upload of their own art vs the amount of spam they can upload as AI art they made is vastly different in 99.9% of the cases. If you mean them uploading art someone else made, then sure you can spam as much, but that can easily be solved by just making a rule against them uploading art they didnt make.
The point still stands though, that the issue is the user spamming the site not the process of making AI art itself, so it's not fair to attribute the abuse to the concept rather than the abusers.
NigBreaker said:
The point still stands though, that the issue is the user spamming the site not the process of making AI art itself, so it's not fair to attribute the abuse to the concept rather than the abusers.
yes, but theory and pragmatics/practicality is different. It's like how earthquakes are actually caused by shifts in the earth's plates, but people cant really do anything about that so they instead earthquake proof buildings instead of trying to stop the shift in plates of the earth. Rules are generally made with pragmatics or practicality in mind, cause if you just want to think in theory, then you really dont need any rules cause everyone in theory can behave correctly by themselves.