Posted under General
WholesomeInspector said:
Mate the thing was a pipe dream. I’m sure that if the ppl who made that thread are still here they’ll say it’s possible, but being real it’s not remotely likely. Reminds me of the nft dating site that got shut down because there were no women on it.
lol. so true. i think we could make it work though. with the right marketing technique.
WholesomeInspector said:
Mate the thing was a pipe dream. I’m sure that if the ppl who made that thread are still here they’ll say it’s possible, but being real it’s not remotely likely. Reminds me of the nft dating site that got shut down because there were no women on it.
Objectively however there are women that are both on this site, as well as women who are right wing and want white partners. Obviously like every dating site it's going to be more men than women, but even an 80/20 split of men to women is still worth it existing. And the interface or application isn't that complicated. It wouldn't be any harder than a booru to make.
IvoryKing said:
lol. so true. i think we could make it work though. with the right marketing technique.
Honestly, I don't even think it would require any marketing from out end. If the application is made, within one year I'd figure it would be as widely know as the "it's OK to be white" meme. 4chan and random youtube political commenters would talk about it and it would spread. And I figure you could get a decent amount of women using it if there is an option you can select to filter out the men who want casual sex vs breeding.
fkiblaze said:
Honestly, I don't even think it would require any marketing from out end. If the application is made, within one year I'd figure it would be as widely know as the "it's OK to be white" meme. 4chan and random youtube political commenters would talk about it and it would spread. And I figure you could get a decent amount of women using it if there is an option you can select to filter out the men who want casual sex vs breeding.
it will take marketing.
mass marketing is what it took for black men and white women to pursue each other in the main stream. it will take similar marketing for white men and black women to become to pursue each other in the mainstream.
and the problem with free dating apps is how they make money.
they basically loose customers when they work correctly. so they are all rigged to work incorrectly. to match people who are doomed to break up in a few weeks. that way they come back to the app, and keep using it.
also, the problem with internet culture, especially right wing internet culture, is that it's male dominated. if "wintr" became as wide spread as "it's okay to be white" it would have a 95% male user base.
to make such a dating app work, we need real world marketing. we need normal black women in the ghetto to know about the app, think positively of it, and use it. it needs mainstream appeal. such as a celebrity endorsement. imagine what would happen if someone as big as Megan the stallion said she met her boyfriend on the app. or even what would happen if a few fat black Instagram influencers with 10k-100k followers said they found their BF on the app. that's how we get a female user base.
also, fat women are good for a start anyway. they are insecure. they'll take any man who will have them. if even a lowly fat woman has overwhelmingly positive experiences on the app, they will tell their more conventionally attractive friends about it, and thus mainstreaming the app.
IvoryKing said:
it will take marketing.
mass marketing is what it took for black men and white women to pursue each other in the main stream. it will take similar marketing for white men and black women to become to pursue each other in the mainstream.
and the problem with free dating apps is how they make money.
they basically loose customers when they work correctly. so they are all rigged to work incorrectly. to match people who are doomed to break up in a few weeks. that way they come back to the app, and keep using it.
also, the problem with internet culture, especially right wing internet culture, is that it's male dominated. if "wintr" became as wide spread as "it's okay to be white" it would have a 95% male user base.
to make such a dating app work, we need real world marketing. we need normal black women in the ghetto to know about the app, think positively of it, and use it. it needs mainstream appeal. such as a celebrity endorsement. imagine what would happen if someone as big as Megan the stallion said she met her boyfriend on the app. or even what would happen if a few fat black Instagram influencers with 10k-100k followers said they found their BF on the app. that's how we get a female user base.
also, fat women are good for a start anyway. they are insecure. they'll take any man who will have them. if even a lowly fat woman has overwhelmingly positive experiences on the app, they will tell their more conventionally attractive friends about it, and thus mainstreaming the app.
Well I wasn't talking about making black women and white men a norm. That's not what wintr was about; it's just a dating site for any women that want to date white men. I'm sure most of the matches will be white men and white women like most dating sites. Also, why would wintr need to have the highest engagement, that's not how the booru is. Companies don't actually exist to maximize profit, these days they exist for social reasons. Look at hollywood for an example. They are willing to take a hit to profit to push woke stuff. If Hollywood was about maximizing profit, they would just make a bunch of pro-Christian movies like "Passion of the Christ". Last I heard that is still the highest grossing R rated film. Yet Christian movies are not made in Hollywood, because it's a Jewish industry, not an industry to make profit. Passion of the christ was the exception because it was made by mel gibson who is kinda based.
I don’t know much about this whole dating app or marketing thing… but what about a private website. Like a site would have to know about to find, not something you’d download through the App Store, like a website you would have click on an invisible icon on a regular site that has nothing to do with “Wintr” that actually leads to “Wintr” does that make sense or should I explain more?
ThirstyMike132 said:
I don’t know much about this whole dating app or marketing thing… but what about a private website. Like a site would have to know about to find, not something you’d download through the App Store, like a website you would have click on an invisible icon on a regular site that has nothing to do with “Wintr” that actually leads to “Wintr” does that make sense or should I explain more?
I get what you are saying, but I don't really see the point because even less women would be on it then. I mean I think the booru should have a link to Wintr, but it shouldn't be private.
fkiblaze said:
Well I wasn't talking about making black women and white men a norm. That's not what wintr was about; it's just a dating site for any women that want to date white men. I'm sure most of the matches will be white men and white women like most dating sites. Also, why would wintr need to have the highest engagement, that's not how the booru is. Companies don't actually exist to maximize profit, these days they exist for social reasons. Look at hollywood for an example. They are willing to take a hit to profit to push woke stuff. If Hollywood was about maximizing profit, they would just make a bunch of pro-Christian movies like "Passion of the Christ". Last I heard that is still the highest grossing R rated film. Yet Christian movies are not made in Hollywood, because it's a Jewish industry, not an industry to make profit. Passion of the christ was the exception because it was made by mel gibson who is kinda based.
Hollywood was about making money for most of history. but i see your point.
the thing is, all the woke companies still turn a profit. they make high grocing movies like "cocaine bear" to finance woke propaganda. it's not hard.
fkiblaze said:
I get what you are saying, but I don't really see the point because even less women would be on it then. I mean I think the booru should have a link to Wintr, but it shouldn't be private.
The only reason I think it should be private is more because we won’t know how some (radical liberals/ radical woke) people would respond to such a think. Imagine the kind of back lash an app like that would get, can you imagine how people would respond to the person or persons who made it if they find out who makes it?
ThirstyMike132 said:
The only reason I think it should be private is more because we won’t know how some (radical liberals/ radical woke) people would respond to such a think. Imagine the kind of back lash an app like that would get, can you imagine how people would respond to the person or persons who made it if they find out who makes it?
It would be no different than the booru, especially if it's sponsored by the booru. Who cares what leftists think, I'm sure they don't like bleached either, but that doesn't matter.
ThirstyMike132 said:
The only reason I think it should be private is more because we won’t know how some (radical liberals/ radical woke) people would respond to such a think. Imagine the kind of back lash an app like that would get, can you imagine how people would respond to the person or persons who made it if they find out who makes it?
To this day I have still yet to see someone define woke. Wtf are you guys talking about
WholesomeInspector said:
To this day I have still yet to see someone define woke. Wtf are you guys talking about
That's so disingenuous since literally everyone on the right not only has defined it but pointed out that leftist themselves define it the same way when they are talking to themselves in private. Even someone as mainstream as Sargon has a video showing lefties defining Woke. Just like how they disingenuously say it's not being taught in schools at the same time as yelling that fascists are removing books on it in states like Florida.
fkiblaze said:
That's so disingenuous since literally everyone on the right not only has defined it but pointed out that leftist themselves define it the same way when they are talking to themselves in private. Even someone as mainstream as Sargon has a video showing lefties defining Woke. Just like how they disingenuously say it's not being taught in schools at the same time as yelling that fascists are removing books on it in states like Florida.
Sargon? Like the ancient ruler? I have no idea what you’re talking about. I only see made up words and words used incorrectly. Ye ever hear “woke” or “sjw” you can rest assured they have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about.
WholesomeInspector said:
Sargon? Like the ancient ruler? I have no idea what you’re talking about. I only see made up words and words used incorrectly. Ye ever hear “woke” or “sjw” you can rest assured they have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about.
Kinda why I'm saying you are disingenuous because anyone who has spent any time on internet politics would've at least heard of Sargon, not to mention like would be on the front of a google search, so you are just acting dumb like you have never heard people define it or so on.
fkiblaze said:
Kinda why I'm saying you are disingenuous because anyone who has spent any time on internet politics would've at least heard of Sargon, not to mention like would be on the front of a google search, so you are just acting dumb like you have never heard people define it or so on.
it's the hatching technique. classic shitlib debating tactic. "her der. what words mean?"
