What exactly makes my edits marked as "Poor Quality"?

My last two edits were marked as ''poor quality'' while my third edit was accepted, although it looks even worse than the last 2, am I missing something or does the moderation just not like me?
post #93895
post #94006

Wth these two look very good, come on mods

2nd one is definitely better, and I would've personally approved it. Worse stuff gets posted by purple names all the time, and I'd rather have people newer to editing getting their stuff approved than all the low effort garbage directly crossposted from r34 clogging up the pages.

I may have an idea on the first one.

At first glance, on their boobs that touch, it could appear that the tats aren't warped. I think it looks fine and it's probably the angle that doesn't really show off the warping.

I think it looks great actually.

Both of these are good imo, especially the second one. I hope a mod sees and approves them :D

Perhaps just because of the resolution of the images, I don't think it's the image editing quality that's the problem.

purifier_blch said:

My last two edits were marked as ''poor quality'' while my third edit was accepted, although it looks even worse than the last 2, am I missing something or does the moderation just not like me?
post #93895
post #94006

First one I rejected due to the warping on her thighs. The tattoos were dislocated a bit too poorly and could've been done better. However, your 2nd one is more than enough.