My last two edits were marked as ''poor quality'' while my third edit was accepted, although it looks even worse than the last 2, am I missing something or does the moderation just not like me?
post #93895
post #94006
Posted under General
My last two edits were marked as ''poor quality'' while my third edit was accepted, although it looks even worse than the last 2, am I missing something or does the moderation just not like me?
post #93895
post #94006
2nd one is definitely better, and I would've personally approved it. Worse stuff gets posted by purple names all the time, and I'd rather have people newer to editing getting their stuff approved than all the low effort garbage directly crossposted from r34 clogging up the pages.
purifier_blch said:
My last two edits were marked as ''poor quality'' while my third edit was accepted, although it looks even worse than the last 2, am I missing something or does the moderation just not like me?
post #93895
post #94006
First one I rejected due to the warping on her thighs. The tattoos were dislocated a bit too poorly and could've been done better. However, your 2nd one is more than enough.