Political containment thread

lol good thread for all the political side rants/tangents we get into. time to state some opinions and political solutions that are controversial. This is not like a manifesto, just a few thoughts I've always had on popular policy talking points

- Economic Policy: mostly keep everything libertarian or free market in policy, with exemptions on military spending, courts, and at least half of the infrastructure and industrial sector should be state funded (simply to provide competition to free enterprise, and options for low income citizens). Free markets, that are fair and properly regulated are by far the most efficient form of markets by far.
- Immigration: Don't pay for immigrants/refugees to live here off of taxpayer dollars, and they will self deport (or be outcompeted), or be culturally and then ethnically homogenized. Take in mostly people of your own or similar ethnicity/culture who are educated and safe. Be stringent with all other kinds of immigrants, especially young male "refugees".
- Finance and monetary policy: Abolish privatized central banking and ban the practice of usury. Institute a state bank that prints money free of debt and interest. Ban both foreigners and citizens who have dual allegiance OUT of the nations money supply and monetary policy, as well as political careers too, especially pertaining to the state's economic and monetary sectors.
- Crime: Punish obscene and violent forms of crime with the highest reasonable forms punishment, death penalty for confirmed murderers, rapists, foreign/domestic terrorists for example. paying back in full the damages of culpable stolen or destroyed property of another as another example. I would go as far as publicly beating people who litter, but that's just me and ideally several votes would come to the kinds of punishments permissible to all kinds of low-end to high-end crime.
- Foreign Policy: Be open to working with and trading with others, especially those who you have good relation or reason with but always at a distance, and mostly remain isolationist in practice. Do not involve the nation with complicated networks of alliances and treaties, and globalist/international organizations
- Abortion rights: imo women should be allowed to abort their fetuses' in the first few weeks, I believe once a baby develops a functioning heart and a brain its essentially unquestionably human life at that point. Others may disagree that it starts at conception, or that it starts way later (lunatics but whatevs), that's ultimately for the public to vote for. My only gripe is that abortion should not be subsidized by anything. If you as a woman want an abortion, pay for it yourself or with the consensual aid of your partner. If you were raped or sexually assaulted, in my world you'd have no issues aborting the baby within a timely manner, and I don't look down on you for doing so.
- Education: Ideally it should be split between private, public and yes even homeschool 30/30/40. Homeschooling should replace pre-school (or variants of pre-school), and be the foundation of a kids' upbringing, public/private schools should be for adolescents, with greater emphasis for trade schools for young adults (15-20) to prepare them for live in the real world and colleges/universities should only be for the most promising and industrious students, with minimal (but not nothing) state subsidies provided. Grants and scholarships should not be handed out to 'disenfranchised' groups, they would be given out only to the most intelligent and competent people regardless of anything else.

these are just ramblings though, and not to be taken too seriously

Out of curiosity; how many of you guys here even watched Europe the last battle?

Poesix69 said:

Out of curiosity; how many of you guys here even watched Europe the last battle?

I watched like 2 of the episodes/parts of the documentary. I prefer watching Asha Logos though on his vids, top tier stuff (some of it’s still on YouTube), highly recommend watching ‘The Interconnectedness of the Aryan Peoples’. I’d also urge people in general to check out ‘The History of Central Banking’ on YouTube (it’s been split into many parts, covering historical figures and their strifes dealing with central banking cabals). Goes into a lot of why the world is so fucked up and kinda has been since well ancient times really, spoiler alert Jew boys love their Usury. Another recommendation I have is GDF, he basically correctly criticised Israel’s entire nation and calls out pretty much everything they’ve done and are doing in extreme detail, including the obvious USS Liberty incident among many other things.

I typically try to stay away from race/rage bait content that is a little too ‘edgy’ and ‘alt-right’ though and focus more on actual factual matters or learning about European history, true history and even some of the esoteric stuff like the Oera Linda book (another topic covered in incredible detail by Asha Logos), or the mythological stories of my ancestors. Stay away from obvious feds like Nick Fuentes, and all these other clowns.

‘The History of Central Banking’

This is actually peak.
-

Europa: the last battle?

This has a lot of (false) propaganda in it, basically making Nazism WAY more digestible, to the normies. There are a lot of very real truths in there as well, of course, but in the end you're watching something that is meant to turn regular White people into remoralized, and re-racinated Ethno-Cultural entities. I remember that I watched 'Europa: The last battle' for the first time, and any amount of depression or guilt that I had just instantly disappeared. I didn't even know that I felt shame about being White before watching the documentary, but after you watch it; that subconscious feeling in your mind just washes away, completely... I also didn't become a hateful person after watching it, either. That will happen to you much later, as you are consistently disappointed and frustrated by the reality of the Western world, its mainstream institutions, and the incompetent governments & retarded vermin that currently rule over us.

Zoomer Historian also has some good stuff on YT.

T_700_Z said:

This has a lot of (false) propaganda in it, basically making Nazism WAY more digestible, to the normies. There are a lot of very real truths in there as well, of course, but in the end you're watching something that is meant to turn regular White people into remoralized, and re-racinated Ethno-Cultural entities. I remember that I watched 'Europa: The last battle' for the first time, and any amount of depression or guilt that I had just instantly disappeared. I didn't even know that I felt shame about being White before watching the documentary, but after you watch it; that subconscious feeling in your mind just washes away, completely... I also didn't become a hateful person after watching it, either. That will happen to you much later, as you are consistently disappointed and frustrated by the reality of the Western world, its mainstream institutions, and the incompetent governments & retarded vermin that currently rule over us.

Yea, that's what i think, too. Every normie to right wing politics should watch it even though it is cringe. They should've skipped the holocaust revisionism part though because i feel like that is too taboo for normies, at least it was in the middle so it doesn't turn off to many normies.

TallWhiteAndHung said:

Zoomer Historian also has some good stuff on YT.

Zoomer Historian and Leather Apron Club are goated

AryanSuperSoldier said:

Zoomer Historian and Leather Apron Club are goated

I hear good things about zoomer historian, but I've seen videos showing how LAC either deliberately lies, or misleads people in some of his videos. In terms of old videos, Alt-hypes older stuff was probably the best, but for newer politics i general just watch academic agent.

https://files.catbox.moe/qitmtr.mp4
This mustache man's words simply echo throughout the generations and manage to hit every single current social issue in the West perfectly. How is this even possible?
-
https://files.catbox.moe/vc18cw.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/fkafkd.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/vk7e8y.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/bozo5i.jpg

T_700_Z said:

https://files.catbox.moe/qitmtr.mp4
This mustache man's words simply echo throughout the generations and manage to hit every single current social issue in the West perfectly. How is this even possible?
-
https://files.catbox.moe/vc18cw.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/fkafkd.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/vk7e8y.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/bozo5i.jpg

Plenty of people new what was going on, since at least the protocols of the elders of zion became popular in the 1920s.

fkiblaze said:

I hear good things about zoomer historian, but I've seen videos showing how LAC either deliberately lies, or misleads people in some of his videos. In terms of old videos, Alt-hypes older stuff was probably the best, but for newer politics i general just watch academic agent.

I haven't seen these videos, and I don't even know what LAC could lie about, he usually downplays the Jewish overrepresentation he covers on various podcasts he covers.

Edit: unfortunately a lot of alt-right types are still too lenient on the woman question, and that's like half of the real issue facing the west/first world, which is why if he was still around on YouTube I'd recommend TFM's videos on women and feminism.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

I haven't seen these videos, and I don't even know what LAC could lie about, he usually downplays the Jewish overrepresentation he covers on various podcasts he covers.

Edit: unfortunately a lot of alt-right types are still too lenient on the woman question, and that's like half of the real issue facing the west/first world, which is why if he was still around on YouTube I'd recommend TFM's videos on women and feminism.

And TFM stands for?

TallWhiteAndHung said:

And TFM stands for?

Turd Flinging Monkey

AryanSuperSoldier said:

I haven't seen these videos, and I don't even know what LAC could lie about, he usually downplays the Jewish overrepresentation he covers on various podcasts he covers.

Edit: unfortunately a lot of alt-right types are still too lenient on the woman question, and that's like half of the real issue facing the west/first world, which is why if he was still around on YouTube I'd recommend TFM's videos on women and feminism.

He was lying or misunderstood studies on Jewish IQ. Cutting out parts from the same studies he cited, that's really the only thing ive seen on him though.

As for TFM, i agree, he was my favorite red pill guy back when I watched him, but he kind just shifted to daily news years ago so i stopped, as i essentially already learned all the redpill stuff by then.

fkiblaze said:

He was lying or misunderstood studies on Jewish IQ. Cutting out parts from the same studies he cited, that's really the only thing ive seen on him though.

As for TFM, i agree, he was my favorite red pill guy back when I watched him, but he kind just shifted to daily news years ago so i stopped, as i essentially already learned all the redpill stuff by then.

I dropped him for the same reasons, but recently he's been redpilled on the JQ (he used to not care as you know) and now he has pretty lively 'discussions' with Halsey (who's Jewish) every once in awhile. So I've been watching him again recently cause everyone else has essentially also become just a daily news guy, might as well get it from someone with an extremely niche stance on all things.

As for LAC I can understand that his videos on the studies on Jewish IQ were probably misleading, but overall I know that even with full context of these studies his overall point was true. Jews are really only hyper intelligent in linguistics domains and avg to even below avg in others. I believe it was an Ubersoy vid that tried to deboonk LAC, but I raise another group who have no connection to LAC or Ubersoy and that actually gets into the weeds of Jewish IQ (manipulation of stats), rather than trying to prove a negative: https://youtu.be/IdNwAD0ywg0

LAC is misleading you about misleading studies that were misleading to those who want to mislead you about the misleading nature of Jewish IQ LMFAO.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

I dropped him for the same reasons, but recently he's been redpilled on the JQ (he used to not care as you know) and now he has pretty lively 'discussions' with Halsey (who's Jewish) every once in awhile. So I've been watching him again recently cause everyone else has essentially also become just a daily news guy, might as well get it from someone with an extremely niche stance on all things.

As for LAC I can understand that his videos on the studies on Jewish IQ were probably misleading, but overall I know that even with full context of these studies his overall point was true. Jews are really only hyper intelligent in linguistics domains and avg to even below avg in others. I believe it was an Ubersoy vid that tried to deboonk LAC, but I raise another group who have no connection to LAC or Ubersoy and that actually gets into the weeds of Jewish IQ (manipulation of stats), rather than trying to prove a negative: https://youtu.be/IdNwAD0ywg0

LAC is misleading you about misleading studies that were misleading to those who want to mislead you about the misleading nature of Jewish IQ LMFAO.

Im subscribed to those people, so im aware of their response, but if you take all three videos into account LAC, ubersoy, and them, you see ashkenazi jews are higher in linguistics+math, not just linguistics, while lower in visua spacial. I think their IQ is about the same as east asians overall. None of this doesn't mean they arent still a subversive problem and use nepotism, though. They have a higher IQ and are ethnocentric, that is why it works for them. Blacks and many nonwhites are ethnocentric and nepotistic too, but they dont have a high IQ so it doesnt let them gain power.

fkiblaze said:

Im subscribed to those people, so im aware of their response, but if you take all three videos into account LAC, ubersoy, and them, you see ashkenazi jews are higher in linguistics+math, not just linguistics, while lower in visua spacial. I think their IQ is about the same as east asians overall. None of this doesn't mean they arent still a subversive problem and use nepotism, though. They have a higher IQ and are ethnocentric, that is why it works for them. Blacks and many nonwhites are ethnocentric and nepotistic too, but they dont have a high IQ so it doesnt let them gain power.

yes, and math. but they're also lower IQ in reasoning/logic domains. But again this is discussing over nothing that we don't already know. I'd still recommend LAC because even if he has a too strong of a bias against Jews, that's still a good thing overall especially when the conclusions are mostly correct. Ubersoy's deboonk was essentially the Reddit "ummm akshually" on full display.

For another younger creator out there that I've been watching recently, I'd recommend SyntheticMan and his livestreams, if you're a gamer and wanting some based game reviews. His doomer hour vids (fanmade) are KINO.

Wasn't familiar with TFM's content. Got into the red pill stuff through Alexander Grace, or Red Pill Interviews as he used to be known as. Watched the TFM vs Destiny debate, pretty good. I still can't believe I gave Destiny the benefit of the doubt and entretained him momentarily after the Rittenhouse thing and trans in womens sports. What a clown.

But since it's on topic and I believe it's something that is getting into the zeitgeist, any opinions on women voting? Women are given authority without any responsibility. They vote left-wing policies like mass migration and going to war, but they don't have to deal with the fallout of said things, since they rely on men to protect them. The women's emancipation momevent is such a lie. "They fought for their right to vote" if walking around naggingly with placards is fighting for ones rights, I don't know what thousands of years of protests by men are. We sacrified so much to have the right to vote, to just grant it to women since we wanted to "do something nice for the ladies".

Universal male sufrage only happened one generation prior to women's sufrage, perhaps even within the same generation. The only reason we are allowed to vote is because the draft exists (at least in my country and countries I have looked into) friends of mine were gobsmacked when I told them the reason we can vote is because in case of war we are obligated to die for our country.

TallWhiteAndHung said:

Wasn't familiar with TFM's content. Got into the red pill stuff through Alexander Grace, or Red Pill Interviews as he used to be known as. Watched the TFM vs Destiny debate, pretty good. I still can't believe I gave Destiny the benefit of the doubt and entretained him momentarily after the Rittenhouse thing and trans in womens sports. What a clown.

But since it's on topic and I believe it's something that is getting into the zeitgeist, any opinions on women voting? Women are given authority without any responsibility. They vote left-wing policies like mass migration and going to war, but they don't have to deal with the fallout of said things, since they rely on men to protect them. The women's emancipation momevent is such a lie. "They fought for their right to vote" if walking around naggingly with placards is fighting for ones rights, I don't know what thousands of years of protests by men are. We sacrified so much to have the right to vote, to just grant it to women since we wanted to "do something nice for the ladies".

Universal male sufrage only happened one generation prior to women's sufrage, perhaps even within the same generation. The only reason we are allowed to vote is because the draft exists (at least in my country and countries I have looked into) friends of mine were gobsmacked when I told them the reason we can vote is because in case of war we are obligated to die for our country.

That’s TFM’s whole schtick, authority must be balanced with responsibility, which on the whole women simply can’t meet as it pertains to certain roles in society, such as paying net taxes, or fighting in wars to defend your sovereignty, or doing jobs that maintain the infrastructure and real prosperity of the nation. Basically women should not be allowed to vote because they are not responsible enough to handle the consequences of their decisions, and they as a voting block can be manipulated much easier than men (men are not immune but still more resistant). There are many reasons why women shouldn’t vote, if you look at general politics of not just America but most western nations, if you were to take out all of women’s voting participation; centre right, to right wing parties and policies win past elections all the time (pushing the Overton window to the right).

Women’s voting patterns can be summed up by their maternal instinct and care morality (as opposed to men’s paternal instincts and justice morality). They vote for massive welfare states that bankrupt the nation, police/surveillance states which impede on our liberties, bureaucratic bloat that only empowers ‘elites’, open borders and mass immigration which drives a wedge between us, subsidising failing businesses/systems, fighting foreign wars for other countries (instead of defending your own on your own terms), red tape regulation that stamps out innovation, and generally adverse towards competition in the markets, oh yeah and they’re soft on crime, initiated the Sexual Revolution which only benefited the top 10% of men, and now demand infinity fertility rights (whilst having no kids), all whilst working cushy office jobs that were given to them by new hiring practices favouring women.
You have to understand that if you’re a girl reading this, this isn’t my opinion on you personally and I’m not trying to make it about how women suck and should be slaves or whatever, this is the real trend of your genders’ voting record, and no amount of rehabilitation and ‘right wing’ education will change women’s behaviour in this regard, not that it would ever happen either. If you’re one of the 0.1% based autistic lesbian aspie tomboys reading this, and you know that you don’t do any of this, you should also understand that if all women’s voting rights were taken away, you would effectively gain because most women vote against your interests, a worthy sacrifice if you think about it like that. That is, if you’re a true right wing girl so don’t sperg out lmao.

TallWhiteAndHung said:

Wasn't familiar with TFM's content. Got into the red pill stuff through Alexander Grace, or Red Pill Interviews as he used to be known as. Watched the TFM vs Destiny debate, pretty good. I still can't believe I gave Destiny the benefit of the doubt and entretained him momentarily after the Rittenhouse thing and trans in womens sports. What a clown.

But since it's on topic and I believe it's something that is getting into the zeitgeist, any opinions on women voting? Women are given authority without any responsibility. They vote left-wing policies like mass migration and going to war, but they don't have to deal with the fallout of said things, since they rely on men to protect them. The women's emancipation momevent is such a lie. "They fought for their right to vote" if walking around naggingly with placards is fighting for ones rights, I don't know what thousands of years of protests by men are. We sacrified so much to have the right to vote, to just grant it to women since we wanted to "do something nice for the ladies".

Universal male sufrage only happened one generation prior to women's sufrage, perhaps even within the same generation. The only reason we are allowed to vote is because the draft exists (at least in my country and countries I have looked into) friends of mine were gobsmacked when I told them the reason we can vote is because in case of war we are obligated to die for our country.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

That’s TFM’s whole schtick, authority must be balanced with responsibility, which on the whole women simply can’t meet as it pertains to certain roles in society, such as paying net taxes, or fighting in wars to defend your sovereignty, or doing jobs that maintain the infrastructure and real prosperity of the nation. Basically women should not be allowed to vote because they are not responsible enough to handle the consequences of their decisions, and they as a voting block can be manipulated much easier than men (men are not immune but still more resistant). There are many reasons why women shouldn’t vote, if you look at general politics of not just America but most western nations, if you were to take out all of women’s voting participation; centre right, to right wing parties and policies win past elections all the time (pushing the Overton window to the right).

Women’s voting patterns can be summed up by their maternal instinct and care morality (as opposed to men’s paternal instincts and justice morality). They vote for massive welfare states that bankrupt the nation, police/surveillance states which impede on our liberties, bureaucratic bloat that only empowers ‘elites’, open borders and mass immigration which drives a wedge between us, subsidising failing businesses/systems, fighting foreign wars for other countries (instead of defending your own on your own terms), red tape regulation that stamps out innovation, and generally adverse towards competition in the markets, oh yeah and they’re soft on crime, initiated the Sexual Revolution which only benefited the top 10% of men, and now demand infinity fertility rights (whilst having no kids), all whilst working cushy office jobs that were given to them by new hiring practices favouring women.
You have to understand that if you’re a girl reading this, this isn’t my opinion on you personally and I’m not trying to make it about how women suck and should be slaves or whatever, this is the real trend of your genders’ voting record, and no amount of rehabilitation and ‘right wing’ education will change women’s behaviour in this regard, not that it would ever happen either. If you’re one of the 0.1% based autistic lesbian aspie tomboys reading this, and you know that you don’t do any of this, you should also understand that if all women’s voting rights were taken away, you would effectively gain because most women vote against your interests, a worthy sacrifice if you think about it like that. That is, if you’re a true right wing girl so don’t sperg out lmao.

Pretty much, there is no rational reason why women should be able to vote. If they must vote because it would be too hard to sell getting rid of the vote, then at least their vote should be segregated so it only effects them.