Posted under General
Yeah I'm cut. Mutilating a child's private parts should be illegal, especially in places that are more secular than religious. Female circumcision is already illegal and depicted as cruelty in many countries and yet somehow male circumcision isn't considered a violation of human rights which is beyond me apparently.
H0sh said:
Yeah I'm cut. Mutilating a child's private parts should be illegal, especially in places that are more secular than religious. Female circumcision is already illegal and depicted as cruelty in many countries and yet somehow male circumcision isn't considered a violation of human rights which is beyond me apparently.
Same reason for most things, the jews
MexiSpicRP said:
Yes the "land voting" is the response often given to republicans who complain about election results when the district maps are all red. Yes they have less people because "land doesn't vote". I would go more into my response to you but this isn't the thread for that.
Welp, well TRUMP Won in a super mega Ultra Maga Landslide, On All fronts so cope bozo.
With
The original poster really should have expected this given that circumcision is a muslim/jewish practice that isn't really practiced in europe and is only really practiced in USA due to having jewish ancestors, anyone into bleached would obviously prefer an uncircumcised penis and the few people who are trying to defend being circumcised seem to just be insecure because they were unfortunate enough to have it done to them.
IvoryFuta-II said:
With
The original poster really should have expected this given that circumcision is a muslim/jewish practice that isn't really practiced in europe and is only really practiced in USA due to having jewish ancestors, anyone into bleached would obviously prefer an uncircumcised penis and the few people who are trying to defend being circumcised seem to just be insecure because they were unfortunate enough to have it done to them.
No, it's practiced in the US as a part of the whole Medical Industry conspiracy by the Seventh Day Adventists effectively buying out the entire medical establishment in the US, and dominating medical policy for about a century.
But yes, it is very true that it is a practice carried on by doctors who think they are doing the right thing™, parents that listen to the experts™, and fathers that can't come to terms that they had at least half the skin and most of the nerves of their penis cut off because of literal sex hating jewish heretics.
hisyoricalroute66 said:
No, it's practiced in the US as a part of the whole Medical Industry conspiracy by the Seventh Day Adventists effectively buying out the entire medical establishment in the US, and dominating medical policy for about a century.
But yes, it is very true that it is a practice carried on by doctors who think they are doing the right thing™, parents that listen to the experts™, and fathers that can't come to terms that they had at least half the skin and most of the nerves of their penis cut off because of literal sex hating jewish heretics.
Doing it for religious reasons is.. whatever I guess. But I hate how the science and medical field will make some random fact up to convince ppl to mutilate children. The operation can go wrong, child or adult and it doesn't change your chances of getting whatever infection or STD. Cleaning your fucking cock is what's doing the most prevention here
While it DOES get rid of phimosis entirely, is that a good enough reason to do it on everyone?
What's next? Defeat breast cancer by removing every pair of tits? Exact same logic. Actually that's even more relevant because breast cancer is a lot more common than men with a severe case of phimosis. So why not remove them? It's ridiculous
