I am curious to be honest, since a part of this site's kinks could be combined with eugenics and selective breeding.
Posted under General
I'm essentially a Darwinist politically so of course I agree with it. I essentially think eugenics is the basis of a society and really the only thing that matters. The difference between a good place to live and a bad place to live just comes down the people and their genetics. That said, I don't think government eugenics is a good idea because everything the government does is dysgenic besides just have a national defense force. Eugenics must be done through natural selection.
2horny4me said:
I think it's important that we breed black people out of the gene pool. Asians can stay though, as they can work jobs that require high intelligence.
I tend to prefer keeping genetic diversity. White people should be pro-conservation of the different animals. The issue isn't random black people in africa living in their mud huts, the issue is when they invade our societies.
fkiblaze said:
I'm essentially a Darwinist politically so of course I agree with it. I essentially think eugenics is the basis of a society and really the only thing that matters. The difference between a good place to live and a bad place to live just comes down the people and their genetics. That said, I don't think government eugenics is a good idea because everything the government does is dysgenic besides just have a national defense force. Eugenics must be done through natural selection.
In my opinion the government should not force white people to breed, but simply encourage those with good traits to do so.
I also think they should remove almost all niggers, chinks, kikes and sand niggers from the gene pool, and breed only those with eachother that have nice assets, a love for white cock and love being subservient.
And then educate them to be subservient slaves.
I mean, that way we'd have slaves that not only do work for us but also please us.
CorruptMika said:
In my opinion the government should not force white people to breed, but simply encourage those with good traits to do so.
I also think they should remove almost all niggers, chinks, kikes and sand niggers from the gene pool, and breed only those with eachother that have nice assets, a love for white cock and love being subservient.
And then educate them to be subservient slaves.
I mean, that way we'd have slaves that not only do work for us but also please us.
You don't need to encourage it, you just need to stand out of it's way by removing all the artificial barriers. Successful people of high quality don't need help, they want people to not hold them back. Also human slavery is inefficient and causes long term problems and morally distasteful. Machines are the perfect servants. Simply removing all the dysgenic government policies would be enough to improve society and people. The government will never be able to out select better than nature for various reasons.
It's a stupid idea pushed forward by idiotic psuedo-science lovers and madmen. When it was endorsed in the United States, it served as an inspiration for the Nazis. There is nothing wrong with a black and white person fucking and having kids. There is nothing wrong with ugly and attractive people fucking and having kids. Genetic diversity is an invaluable asset to the human race, and any attempts to crack down on it through selective breeding is a stupid idea.
HarvestingSeason said:
It's a stupid idea pushed forward by idiotic psuedo-science lovers and madmen. When it was endorsed in the United States, it served as an inspiration for the Nazis. There is nothing wrong with a black and white person fucking and having kids. There is nothing wrong with ugly and attractive people fucking and having kids. Genetic diversity is an invaluable asset to the human race, and any attempts to crack down on it through selective breeding is a stupid idea.
There is nothing psuedo-scientific about it. Lefties just hate any science that goes against their theology of equality. Nazis also banned smoking and were against animal abuse, doesn't mean it's wrong.
And having as much possible different genetics is not in itself "good genetic diversity" otherwise you would support every genetic deformity and disease. The whole point of genetic diversity is to have nature weed out the bad ones. So yes, encouraging things like a bunch of mulatto kids does have issues, and no, it's not genetic diversity, in fact it moves the world twords a single brown race.
HarvestingSeason said:
It's a stupid idea pushed forward by idiotic psuedo-science lovers and madmen. When it was endorsed in the United States, it served as an inspiration for the Nazis. There is nothing wrong with a black and white person fucking and having kids. There is nothing wrong with ugly and attractive people fucking and having kids. Genetic diversity is an invaluable asset to the human race, and any attempts to crack down on it through selective breeding is a stupid idea.
Equality is a false god my fren.
fkiblaze said:
I'm essentially a Darwinist politically so of course I agree with it. I essentially think eugenics is the basis of a society and really the only thing that matters. The difference between a good place to live and a bad place to live just comes down the people and their genetics. That said, I don't think government eugenics is a good idea because everything the government does is dysgenic besides just have a national defense force. Eugenics must be done through natural selection.
That shit sounds kinda scary not gonna lie.
Uhhhhhh said:
Equality is a false god my fren.
That shit sounds kinda scary not gonna lie.
How can you say the first line and then the second in the same post?
If equality is a false God, then there is really only 2 options. Either you don't have any interest in improving society, so you don't really care either way, or you do want to improve human society which means you would want more of the above average people instead of below average.
fkiblaze said:
How can you say the first line and then the second in the same post?
If equality is a false God, then there is really only 2 options. Either you don't have any interest in improving society, so you don't really care either way, or you do want to improve human society which means you would want more of the above average people instead of below average.
I mean, I’m against racemixing (in the sense of having race mixed children) and the disabled reproducing, but calling myself a ‘darwinist’ it’s too harsh, idk.
Uhhhhhh said:
I mean, I’m against racemixing (in the sense of having race mixed children) and the disabled reproducing, but calling myself a ‘darwinist’ it’s too harsh, idk.
Considering Darwin is one of the fathers of modern biology, i dont see how that is an issue. Humans are biological creatures so basing your views on biology make sense. And really, it's just a way to say youre libertarian while also stating your basis for why you are one, because there are a lot of different types of libertarians. Some libertarians are hippies that just think the government is mean and should stay out of people's business, while other libertarians think more pragmatically and it's more about an efficiency problem, and have various reasons for that.
CorruptMika said:
I am curious to be honest, since a part of this site's kinks could be combined with eugenics and selective breeding.
I think wipe out males of every other race then aryan im white but brown hair and hazel eyes so i would have to go maybe it could be lenient and letting not aryans whites be bread out but as long as aryans take over the world its fine