Something I noticed is that non-white women are way more compatible with white men than men of their own race, what's the biology (or muh heckin soyience) behind it?
Posted under General
Women are generally very socially astute. They have to carry a baby for 9 months and be vulnerable for the next few years until the offspring can fend for itself. This is why their reproductive strategy is qualitative because they are sacrificing a lot to ensure genetic continuity and they need a mate that will protect and provide for them.
As to why white men are superior? Most of it is due to geography. Europe is a peninsula made of smaller peninsulas, an ideal battleground. Tribes and kingdoms competing for hundreds of years exchanging knowledge, technology and values. I mean, America was still in the Bronze Age when we arrived, Africa barely out of the Stone Age. Also, Christianity.
Statistically, only nigger women prefer their own to white men which is clearly social pressure from the “horrors” of slavery (LOL). Although as much as they outwardly display this preference, we all know what black women really want. There is a study that claims black women and white men are the happiest, most lasting relationships.
TallWhiteAndHung said:
Women are generally very socially astute. They have to carry a baby for 9 months and be vulnerable for the next few years until the offspring can fend for itself. This is why their reproductive strategy is qualitative because they are sacrificing a lot to ensure genetic continuity and they need a mate that will protect and provide for them.
As to why white men are superior? Most of it is due to geography. Europe is a peninsula made of smaller peninsulas, an ideal battleground. Tribes and kingdoms competing for hundreds of years exchanging knowledge, technology and values. I mean, America was still in the Bronze Age when we arrived, Africa barely out of the Stone Age. Also, Christianity.
Statistically, only nigger women prefer their own to white men which is clearly social pressure from the “horrors” of slavery (LOL). Although as much as they outwardly display this preference, we all know what black women really want. There is a study that claims black women and white men are the happiest, most lasting relationships.
SubmissiveLatino said:
Might be due to colonialism and how the white races basically studied others races so they might be more socially adapted to more than their own race.(could be wrong though)
Generally agree. White people in general are more respecting of other cultures and peoples and the only race that takes it to far with left liberal whites preferring non-whites to whites and those studies. Possibly due to Christian missionaries and them trying to promote Christianity while integrating it into the local cultures.
TallWhiteAndHung said:
Women are generally very socially astute. They have to carry a baby for 9 months and be vulnerable for the next few years until the offspring can fend for itself. This is why their reproductive strategy is qualitative because they are sacrificing a lot to ensure genetic continuity and they need a mate that will protect and provide for them.
As to why white men are superior? Most of it is due to geography. Europe is a peninsula made of smaller peninsulas, an ideal battleground. Tribes and kingdoms competing for hundreds of years exchanging knowledge, technology and values. I mean, America was still in the Bronze Age when we arrived, Africa barely out of the Stone Age. Also, Christianity.
Statistically, only nigger women prefer their own to white men which is clearly social pressure from the “horrors” of slavery (LOL). Although as much as they outwardly display this preference, we all know what black women really want. There is a study that claims black women and white men are the happiest, most lasting relationships.
It's more of the climate if anything. African tribes fight each other all the time, too. The higher IQ of people in colder climates is due to them having to plan ahead for food and winter and those unable to make a big picture view staving off or freezing to death. In africa you can get food year round so planning and thinking ahead isnt really necessary, just who has the bigger stick or tribe.
fkiblaze said:
It's more of the climate if anything. African tribes fight each other all the time, too. The higher IQ of people in colder climates is due to them having to plan ahead for food and winter and those unable to make a big picture view staving off or freezing to death. In africa you can get food year round so planning and thinking ahead isnt really necessary, just who has the bigger stick or tribe.
true. i would say that that's why blacks are more compatable with whites than Asians though. blacks and whites are both more warrior oriented, whereas Asians are more organized and peaceful.
BigWhiteBull said:
true. i would say that that's why blacks are more compatable with whites than Asians though. blacks and whites are both more warrior oriented, whereas Asians are more organized and peaceful.
Whites have both, and asians have had warriors, too. Really only africa has never had peaceful civilization, except for the few decades under white rule.
fkiblaze said:
Whites have both, and asians have had warriors, too. Really only africa has never had peaceful civilization, except for the few decades under white rule.
the modern era is an aberration. for most of history, Europeans were relentlessly warlike. same as Africans and Arabs. and i say we were better for it.
BigWhiteBull said:
the modern era is an aberration. for most of history, Europeans were relentlessly warlike. same as Africans and Arabs. and i say we were better for it.
If you want to use that as a standard it applies to Asians, too then. They also had constant wars. Everybody had more wars in the past before nuclear weapons.
Chuddy88 said:
Absolutely joeover for Nigger bros
fkiblaze said:
If you want to use that as a standard it applies to Asians, too then. They also had constant wars. Everybody had more wars in the past before nuclear weapons.
they had more war in history, true, but they also had multi century eras of peace. especially in china. peaceful times in Europe typically only last a few decades.
BigWhiteBull said:
they had more war in history, true, but they also had multi century eras of peace. especially in china. peaceful times in Europe typically only last a few decades.
Depends on what you mean by peace i suppose. somewhere in a region always has peace most of the time, meanwhile other areas of the region has violence. Im not sure china or japan has had centuries of peace if you mean the entire nation. Cause they had civil wars, clan wars, etc, too, peace isn't just external wars.
An Aryan man is a combination of all the rarest phenotypes on earth. Tall, blonde haired, blue eyed, pale white skin. A lot of us are also raised not to sleep around, which means we're more family oriented. I'm sure having a white husband in the non-white world is a woman's equivalent of having a stereotypical trad wife from the east.
itsoktobewhiteisback said:
An Aryan man is a combination of all the rarest phenotypes on earth. Tall, blonde haired, blue eyed, pale white skin. A lot of us are also raised not to sleep around, which means we're more family oriented. I'm sure having a white husband in the non-white world is a woman's equivalent of having a stereotypical trad wife from the east.
that's why male chastity is a good thing. Andrew Tate is right about some things, but he's wrong about getting laid. it doesn't attract future wives. just hoes.
BigWhiteBull said:
that's why male chastity is a good thing. Andrew Tate is right about some things, but he's wrong about getting laid. it doesn't attract future wives. just hoes.
Not to get /pol/itical but Tate pimped out underaged white girls, there's almost nothing worse than that to me.
itsoktobewhiteisback said:
Not to get /pol/itical but Tate pimped out underaged white girls, there's almost nothing worse than that to me.
True
The Dude is a sex-trafficer
Even if he wasn't he's a mixed race clown who sees women as objects and I don't take him seriously because of that
"Top G" my ass
itsoktobewhiteisback said:
Not to get /pol/itical but Tate pimped out underaged white girls, there's almost nothing worse than that to me.
Arent those just leftwing news slander like most times they go after people on the "right". like i know his brother ran a cam site, but asfaik they were all legal, and that was his brother anyway