destiny 2. everything is burning to the ground but im still addicted lol
Posted under General
JokienStudios said:
Pathfinder Kingmaker... for months that game is a fucking long ass Epos, if you thought Witcher 3 was long try playing that monster
I haven't played kingmaker but I played wraith of the righteous and i have to say im kinda disappointed in the arcane spellcaster classes, especially wizard. For whatever reason wizard is the worse spellcaster even though he should be best? Like all his class abilities just give him an equal or worse version of a spell, so nothing lets him outperform, and he has the lowest accuracy with spells that do attack rolls. Somehow a warrior casting hellfire ray or so on, is more accurate than a wizard casting it. Is that how the table top game is, and they were just being faithful to the original, or is that something just about that game. IDK if anyone here plays the table top version of pathfinder to tell me, though.
fkiblaze said:
I haven't played kingmaker but I played wraith of the righteous and i have to say im kinda disappointed in the arcane spellcaster classes, especially wizard. For whatever reason wizard is the worse spellcaster even though he should be best? Like all his class abilities just give him an equal or worse version of a spell, so nothing lets him outperform, and he has the lowest accuracy with spells that do attack rolls. Somehow a warrior casting hellfire ray or so on, is more accurate than a wizard casting it. Is that how the table top game is, and they were just being faithful to the original, or is that something just about that game. IDK if anyone here plays the table top version of pathfinder to tell me, though.
Never played the tabletob version, but I assume its almost identical since Owlcat games tried to make it as accurate as possible
Well pure arcane Spellcasters in general are pretty weak in the beginning but get extremly powerful towards the end. Imo a bad pay off since you struggle most with your party early and midgame
And wizards are even worse since they dont have a way to specialise, which means they dont do extra damage in certain areas. But you might have also built your Wizard wrong since that game punishes you if you mess up with character build too much
JokienStudios said:
Never played the tabletob version, but I assume its almost identical since Owlcat games tried to make it as accurate as possible
Well pure arcane Spellcasters in general are pretty weak in the beginning but get extremly powerful towards the end. Imo a bad pay off since you struggle most with your party early and midgame
And wizards are even worse since they dont have a way to specialise, which means they dont do extra damage in certain areas. But you might have also built your Wizard wrong since that game punishes you if you mess up with character build too much
I mean I'm not having trouble in the game, and I know in general PRG mechanics magic gets stronger as you get higher spells, I just mean statistically it feels pointless that my wizard is worse spellcaster than something like a dual magic caster that specs into bows or rapiers and magic. I don't really die in the game it just it feels like I'm playing a pointless class, since even people who don't even have magic levels can outperform wizard in magic if they just get scrolls or so on. Baulder gate 3 did a much better job with wizard, though it doesn't has as many spells or so on as pathfinder. Also pathfinder has a way better concentration system since you can do multiple buffs on yourself.
Wasteland 3. I just want to beat it, and play another game. It's on my backlog. It's fun I made my Leader Chuck Norris, Heavy Weapons is Duke Nukem, Combat Medic is Johnny Utah, Sniper is Siper Bitch I named Deadeye. It's fun I like it's Dark Humour, but it kinda got nerfed when xbox bought it out. So the humour is less edgy.