Whites adopting black children

So i've heard about a "controversy" of a white UFC fighter (fogot his name) adopting two black babies togheter with his white wife. In a interview he said "I don't see them as black children, i see them as children".

Then a lot of black people got angry for no reason other than "culture, waaaaah racism racism!!!!".

I am fucking pissed off at those retards who constantly whine about " racism!! racism!!! why cant we live togheter!!?!?111 waah!!!" and then get pissed off when people actually try to live in unity and peace.
Those black kids are probably gonna get a 100% better life with white parents than their disfunctional black parents that needed to give them up because of whatever the fuck was wrong with them.

What's your opinion on this matter? Should the white couple even adopt black kids? Or do you like that the children won't be as retarded as their biological parents?

I think that anyone should be allowed to adopt whoever they like. The reason white people adopt more black children is because that's who is available to adopt! There are very little whites in the adoption systems/foster homes but there's a overwhelming amount of blacks. If we started segregating adoption by color there'd be no black children adopted since black people can't even meet the requirements to properly take care of their biological children (that's why they get taken away), let alone adopt!

LatinaOfHearts said:

I think that anyone should be allowed to adopt whoever they like. The reason white people adopt more black children is because that's who is available to adopt! There are very little whites in the adoption systems/foster homes but there's a overwhelming amount of blacks. If we started segregating adoption by color there'd be no black children adopted since black people can't even meet the requirements to properly take care of their biological children (that's why they get taken away), let alone adopt!

segregated adoption by race lol, more like the louder they scream against racism the less they know what racism even is.

the_polbwcV2 said:

So i've heard about a "controversy" of a white UFC fighter (fogot his name) adopting two black babies togheter with his white wife. In a interview he said "I don't see them as black children, i see them as children".

Then a lot of black people got angry for no reason other than "culture, waaaaah racism racism!!!!".

I am fucking pissed off at those retards who constantly whine about " racism!! racism!!! why cant we live togheter!!?!?111 waah!!!" and then get pissed off when people actually try to live in unity and peace.
Those black kids are probably gonna get a 100% better life with white parents than their disfunctional black parents that needed to give them up because of whatever the fuck was wrong with them.

What's your opinion on this matter? Should the white couple even adopt black kids? Or do you like that the children won't be as retarded as their biological parents?

Honestly that’s pretty fucking adorable of that man. The Twitter/tiktok monkeys are just making asses of themselves in a desperate grab for attention (so nothing new here)

the_polbwcV2 said:

So i've heard about a "controversy" of a white UFC fighter (fogot his name) adopting two black babies togheter with his white wife. In a interview he said "I don't see them as black children, i see them as children".

Then a lot of black people got angry for no reason other than "culture, waaaaah racism racism!!!!".

I am fucking pissed off at those retards who constantly whine about " racism!! racism!!! why cant we live togheter!!?!?111 waah!!!" and then get pissed off when people actually try to live in unity and peace.
Those black kids are probably gonna get a 100% better life with white parents than their disfunctional black parents that needed to give them up because of whatever the fuck was wrong with them.

What's your opinion on this matter? Should the white couple even adopt black kids? Or do you like that the children won't be as retarded as their biological parents?

Niggers getting angry for no reason? What else is new lol

I always found transracial adoption kinda weird, like your super xenophilic or something, but if you wana do it i dont really care. There are plenty of studies on it, so do think your going to make that much of an improvement for the child. Sure you can be less abusive or keep them away from gangs, so emotionally it might be better, but IQ of adopted black kids in a white family isn't any different than adopted in a black family.

fkiblaze said:

I always found transracial adoption kinda weird, like your super xenophilic or something, but if you wana do it i dont really care. There are plenty of studies on it, so do think your going to make that much of an improvement for the child. Sure you can be less abusive or keep them away from gangs, so emotionally it might be better, but IQ of adopted black kids in a white family isn't any different than adopted in a black family.

Might be weird to hear someone with my username say this but IQ doesn’t matter that much. What I mean is, people don’t need a high IQ to behave in polite society, which is what I think you’re implying here. Native Americans have IQs rivalling whites yet they have objectively worse life outcomes than even blacks. There is simply no argument that sidesteps this glaring contradiction in race realism. The major common denominators between these two wholly different races is welfare dependence and the breaking up of families through draconian feminist legislation.
So to bring it back to the topic at hand, actually it probably is better for the adoptees to be raised in an affluent white family, since they have independence from welfare and a (hopefully) stable family structure. Now they’re still gonna be exposed to the broader culture eventually, which for anyone with eyes can see that it’s not good, but you can’t control for that even with a high IQ or whatever.

the_polbwcV2 said:

So i've heard about a "controversy" of a white UFC fighter (fogot his name) adopting two black babies togheter with his white wife. In a interview he said "I don't see them as black children, i see them as children".

Then a lot of black people got angry for no reason other than "culture, waaaaah racism racism!!!!".

I am fucking pissed off at those retards who constantly whine about " racism!! racism!!! why cant we live togheter!!?!?111 waah!!!" and then get pissed off when people actually try to live in unity and peace.
Those black kids are probably gonna get a 100% better life with white parents than their disfunctional black parents that needed to give them up because of whatever the fuck was wrong with them.

What's your opinion on this matter? Should the white couple even adopt black kids? Or do you like that the children won't be as retarded as their biological parents?

This is just the case of “white people are evil” that the (((media))) and (((education system))) has been drilling into the broader zeitgeist for decades now. Doesn’t matter what we do, we’re always the problem.

My opinion on adoption in general is skewed because of how much the intent of it has changed. Many moons ago, in the long gone before times, elites (that is to say patriarchs) would adopt individuals that they saw had potential (militarily, strategically, politically), or would adopt to form bonds with other families/clans to strengthen ties and alliances, and I think this is the masculine impulse and reasoning for adoption which is long since gone.

Now it’s relegated to the upper/middle class liberals basically to adopting babies and children, which is basically the same thing as voluntarily cucking yourself for no reason, beyond virtue signalling. I also think it’s wrong to have kids just to put them into adoption or foster care because you can’t afford them, which is why I support abortion among other reasons, but your genetics shouldn’t be rewarded with others having to take care of your literal mistakes. We’re retarding nature. So no, despite the fact that the kids will turn out better than if they were left to nature to sort them out, I don’t think it’s good for whites to adopt black kids or any unwanted kids for that matter.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

Might be weird to hear someone with my username say this but IQ doesn’t matter that much. What I mean is, people don’t need a high IQ to behave in polite society, which is what I think you’re implying here. Native Americans have IQs rivalling whites yet they have objectively worse life outcomes than even blacks. There is simply no argument that sidesteps this glaring contradiction in race realism. The major common denominators between these two wholly different races is welfare dependence and the breaking up of families through draconian feminist legislation.
So to bring it back to the topic at hand, actually it probably is better for the adoptees to be raised in an affluent white family, since they have independence from welfare and a (hopefully) stable family structure. Now they’re still gonna be exposed to the broader culture eventually, which for anyone with eyes can see that it’s not good, but you can’t control for that even with a high IQ or whatever.

I already said they were less likely to join gangs and implied the crime rate would be lower, which yes is related to welfare programs as black people had lower crimes rates before welfare was made, but IQ still matters for other things in life. Also, when people mention IQ they also tend to imply things that correlate heavily with IQ like time preference and inhibition control. IQ really only matters for economic and job skills but higher IQ also tends to correlate with lower time preference and other beneficial traits.

Michael Chandler. First child was adopted. Second child was through surrogacy. I can understand adopting a child that happens to be black. Adoption should be championed. Finding a black surrogate mother to ensure that the child will be black I do find a bit odd.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

This is just the case of “white people are evil” that the (((media))) and (((education system))) has been drilling into the broader zeitgeist for decades now. Doesn’t matter what we do, we’re always the problem.

My opinion on adoption in general is skewed because of how much the intent of it has changed. Many moons ago, in the long gone before times, elites (that is to say patriarchs) would adopt individuals that they saw had potential (militarily, strategically, politically), or would adopt to form bonds with other families/clans to strengthen ties and alliances, and I think this is the masculine impulse and reasoning for adoption which is long since gone.

Now it’s relegated to the upper/middle class liberals basically to adopting babies and children, which is basically the same thing as voluntarily cucking yourself for no reason, beyond virtue signaling. I also think it’s wrong to have kids just to put them into adoption or foster care because you can’t afford them, which is why I support abortion among other reasons, but your genetics shouldn’t be rewarded with others having to take care of your literal mistakes. We’re retarding nature. So no, despite the fact that the kids will turn out better than if they were left to nature to sort them out, I don’t think it’s good for whites to adopt black kids or any unwanted kids for that matter.

There are a few situations where adoption isn't voluntarily cucking yourself tho, i have a friend who was in that situation, but yes these transracial adoption situations are that. That said, adoption is voluntary, so you arent actually having a long term negative evolutionary effect unless you force people to adopt, cause all the cucked white couples that choose to adopt some black kids instead of have their own kids are just removing themselves form the gene pool so in the long run there will be less cucked white people. For dysgenics to actually be a thing in the long term it requires forced thing, like welfare forcing people to fund other peoples bad decisions, or so on.
Most voluntary decisions arent naturally dysgenic because you are just harming yourself which are the genes responsible for those bad decisions.

AryanSuperSoldier said:
Now it’s relegated to the upper/middle class liberals basically to adopting babies and children, which is basically the same thing as voluntarily cucking yourself for no reason, beyond virtue signalling. I also think it’s wrong to have kids just to put them into adoption or foster care because you can’t afford them, which is why I support abortion among other reasons, but your genetics shouldn’t be rewarded with others having to take care of your literal mistakes. We’re retarding nature. So no, despite the fact that the kids will turn out better than if they were left to nature to sort them out, I don’t think it’s good for whites to adopt black kids or any unwanted kids for that matter.

I literally cannot understand the points you're trying to make here.
1) most couples you say are "voluntarily cucking themselves" actually were cucked by God or their own genetics. Most people adopt because they literally have no other way of having a family. IVF is extremely ineffective, can break up marriages (sperm or egg donor making partner insecure) and surrogacy isn't far from absolutely imperfect either. It's the most stress free, viable and overall less traumatizing and positive way for infertile people to have a family.
2) you're not "punishing" a family or black people or whoever by deciding not to adopt, neither are you "rewarding" it when you adopt. In any case you're "punishing" or "rewarding" a child that didn't ask to be brought into this world.

LatinaOfHearts said:

I literally cannot understand the points you're trying to make here.
1) most couples you say are "voluntarily cucking themselves" actually were cucked by God or their own genetics. Most people adopt because they literally have no other way of having a family. IVF is extremely ineffective, can break up marriages (sperm or egg donor making partner insecure) and surrogacy isn't far from absolutely imperfect either. It's the most stress free, viable and overall less traumatizing and positive way for infertile people to have a family.
2) you're not "punishing" a family or black people or whoever by deciding not to adopt, neither are you "rewarding" it when you adopt. In any case you're "punishing" or "rewarding" a child that didn't ask to be brought into this world.

1) this is partly what i was getting at that some situations of adoption make sense biologically, but im not so sure that it's true of those transracial adoptions. My understanding is they can have kids they are just xenophiliac with outgroup biases that want to show how anti-racist they are by having a black child, not people that cant reproduce in most situations.
2) I disagree in this second point tho, and was one of the things i was implying with my post about IQ. A lot of these black adoptions are propagating the cycle. It's not like these adopted kids then go on to think how bad it was their parents were irresponsible and brought them into the world without them wanting to. They themselves go on to do the same thing and irresponsibly have kids. I havent seen any studies that says adopted kids are more likely to be responsible parents than average or so on. A lot of the time it's "like father like son". And even if that wasnt the case, the most important part would be to look at if that's the case for the future generation, ie grandkids.

LatinaOfHearts said:

I literally cannot understand the points you're trying to make here.
1) most couples you say are "voluntarily cucking themselves" actually were cucked by God or their own genetics. Most people adopt because they literally have no other way of having a family. IVF is extremely ineffective, can break up marriages (sperm or egg donor making partner insecure) and surrogacy isn't far from absolutely imperfect either. It's the most stress free, viable and overall less traumatizing and positive way for infertile people to have a family.
2) you're not "punishing" a family or black people or whoever by deciding not to adopt, neither are you "rewarding" it when you adopt. In any case you're "punishing" or "rewarding" a child that didn't ask to be brought into this world.

1) exceptions of infertility were omitted because they are exceptions, a staggeringly small percentage of people isn't worth generalizing about. perfectly healthy and viable families opting to adopt instead of having kids of their own is imo, and I know its weird to say, voluntarily cucking. Now if they've already HAD kids of their own previously and in their old age or something comes up and they just can't have anymore kids then that circumvents the first issue I had, because they've already passed on their genes.
2) I respectfully disagree, it's not about the intention to 'punish' or 'reward', its about the outcome. Eventually though, natural selection always 'wins'.

fkiblaze said:

I already said they were less likely to join gangs and implied the crime rate would be lower, which yes is related to welfare programs as black people had lower crimes rates before welfare was made, but IQ still matters for other things in life. Also, when people mention IQ they also tend to imply things that correlate heavily with IQ like time preference and inhibition control. IQ really only matters for economic and job skills but higher IQ also tends to correlate with lower time preference and other beneficial traits.

Yes I agree, I just feel like the issue of IQ as it relates to race is in many regards overhyped, and especially by people in these circles. That's not to say that I don't agree that there are very real differences in races, such as blacks generally having lower IQs, but then again I need to remind you all that Native Americans have IQs rivalling whites and their outcomes are still worse than Blacks for easily understood reasons, namely welfare dependence.

fkiblaze said:

There are a few situations where adoption isn't voluntarily cucking yourself tho, i have a friend who was in that situation, but yes these transracial adoption situations are that. That said, adoption is voluntary, so you arent actually having a long term negative evolutionary effect unless you force people to adopt, cause all the cucked white couples that choose to adopt some black kids instead of have their own kids are just removing themselves form the gene pool so in the long run there will be less cucked white people. For dysgenics to actually be a thing in the long term it requires forced thing, like welfare forcing people to fund other peoples bad decisions, or so on.
Most voluntary decisions arent naturally dysgenic because you are just harming yourself which are the genes responsible for those bad decisions.

I just want to say that I agree with this in general pretty strongly.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

This is just the case of “white people are evil” that the (((media))) and (((education system))) has been drilling into the broader zeitgeist for decades now. Doesn’t matter what we do, we’re always the problem.

My opinion on adoption in general is skewed because of how much the intent of it has changed. Many moons ago, in the long gone before times, elites (that is to say patriarchs) would adopt individuals that they saw had potential (militarily, strategically, politically), or would adopt to form bonds with other families/clans to strengthen ties and alliances, and I think this is the masculine impulse and reasoning for adoption which is long since gone.

Now it’s relegated to the upper/middle class liberals basically to adopting babies and children, which is basically the same thing as voluntarily cucking yourself for no reason, beyond virtue signalling. I also think it’s wrong to have kids just to put them into adoption or foster care because you can’t afford them, which is why I support abortion among other reasons, but your genetics shouldn’t be rewarded with others having to take care of your literal mistakes. We’re retarding nature. So no, despite the fact that the kids will turn out better than if they were left to nature to sort them out, I don’t think it’s good for whites to adopt black kids or any unwanted kids for that matter.

I wasn't expecting to hear a based opinion on abortion here. Yeah I support abortion for that same reason.

I think the only real problem with a white couple adopting a black child is really if the white parents will be able to handle the identity issues that come along with being a black person in the world they live. Skin color is one of the first things children see. And while the parents can love their child unconditionally, the world isn't always that way.

I couldn't imagine adopting a child that's not white if I were infertile, I couldn't identify myself to him otherwise, I don't understand the choice...

AryanSuperSoldier said:

1) exceptions of infertility were omitted because they are exceptions, a staggeringly small percentage of people isn't worth generalizing about. perfectly healthy and viable families opting to adopt instead of having kids of their own is imo, and I know its weird to say, voluntarily cucking. Now if they've already HAD kids of their own previously and in their old age or something comes up and they just can't have anymore kids then that circumvents the first issue I had, because they've already passed on their genes.

This is kind of the situation with one of my friends. they had a rare ethnicity of kid for the country they were in, and then later adopted another kid with the same ethnicity of their child so they would have a sibling that would be more genetically similar to them than the rest of the kids in the country and so on. stuff like this makes sense biologically.

they should have there own white children not raise some orphan niggers if there girls then thats fine they can marry whites

the_polbwcV2 said:

So i've heard about a "controversy" of a white UFC fighter (fogot his name) adopting two black babies togheter with his white wife. In a interview he said "I don't see them as black children, i see them as children".

Then a lot of black people got angry for no reason other than "culture, waaaaah racism racism!!!!".

I am fucking pissed off at those retards who constantly whine about " racism!! racism!!! why cant we live togheter!!?!?111 waah!!!" and then get pissed off when people actually try to live in unity and peace.
Those black kids are probably gonna get a 100% better life with white parents than their disfunctional black parents that needed to give them up because of whatever the fuck was wrong with them.

What's your opinion on this matter? Should the white couple even adopt black kids? Or do you like that the children won't be as retarded as their biological parents?

If you're adopting a child outside of your race for brownie points, that's just sad and cuck-like behavior. If you can't conceive a child, try to find a child who looks like you and if you can't, I guess adopt one you can find. It depends but in some cases, white parents can be better than ethnic parents. Why? Here's a storytime.
Storytime: I was acquainces with this guy who had been adopted by a white family because his mom (i think she was a mentally ill black lady with bipolar, he never specified anything so take it with grains of salt) was too mentally ill to take care of him and so when he was adopted by his white family, he came out relatively sane and normal plus he acts whiter than any tradcath1488 (aka some mexican guy larping as white) user on Twitter ever existed. I think this is the only case where it's valid: Ethnic kid has abusive/mentally ill ethnic parents so he gets taken to white families and they assimilate so that means they will not carry the burdens of their people such as criminal/ratchet behavior. The guy acts more normal than some people I know in which some of them act like gangsters and hoodrats and it's sad to throw away your culture and replace it with degenerate ones.