the_polbwcV2 said:
Thats exactly why i love this forum
the next school shooter right here
Posted under General
MexiSpicRP said:
He said he likes to come here to fight. What else do you think is going to happen in the future?
OH HELLLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOOOO
I come here to fight people that have a different opinion than mine. I listen to their arguments, i argument back (with some slurs), they argument back (with some slurs) and then we go on with our day.
My mental health is faaar too strong and healthy after 2 years of therapy. The only things i'm gonna kill are fish (i love to go fishing), rats (i watch the mink man on yt regulary) or bugs.
the_polbwcV2 said:
OH HELLLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOOOO
I come here to fight people that have a different opinion than mine. I listen to their arguments, i argument back (with some slurs), they argument back (with some slurs) and then we go on with our day.
My mental health is faaar too strong and healthy after 2 years of therapy. The only things i'm gonna kill are fish (i love to go fishing), rats (i watch the mink man on yt regulary) or bugs.
No you’re clearly an extremist with a manifesto because you debate retards like me on the internet about bleached topics. You alt-right Knot-C!
MexiSpicRP said:
He said he likes to come here to fight. What else do you think is going to happen in the future?
"everyone in my high school/college debate club are school shooters", or "everyone in UFC and boxing are school shooters". It's actually the opposite. The more passive and quiet kid that hides is more likely to be the school shooter, not the loudmouth or so on.
fkiblaze said:
"everyone in my high school/college debate club are school shooters", or "everyone in UFC and boxing are school shooters". It's actually the opposite. The more passive and quiet kid that hides is more likely to be the school shooter, not the loudmouth or so on.
Didn't Connor McGregor beat the shit out of an old man? He threw a chair at some people on a bus. And he is as loud as they come.
MexiSpicRP said:
Didn't Connor McGregor beat the shit out of an old man? He threw a chair at some people on a bus. And he is as loud as they come.
Probably, i dont follow UFC, i never said UFC fighters and boxers dont get in fights. Especially since he is irish. He is probably getting in a bar fight every other week. That's different than shooting up places though.
fkiblaze said:
Probably, i dont follow UFC, i never said UFC fighters and boxers dont get in fights. Especially since he is irish. He is probably getting in a bar fight every other week. That's different than shooting up places though.
It's not really that far off to be honest...I could bring up that other UFC fighter who was in domestic violence and beat up his porn star girlfriend Christy Mack. Seek fights, you find fights. And eventually people get so insecure about it they bring a gun. Then surprise! You just got america'd.
MexiSpicRP said:
It's not really that far off to be honest...I could bring up that other UFC fighter who was in domestic violence and beat up his porn star girlfriend Christy Mack. Seek fights, you find fights. And eventually people get so insecure about it they bring a gun. Then surprise! You just got america'd.
It’s extremely far off. Most school shooters are basically anxious bullied and drugged up incels raised by single moms who take out all their pent up resentment on everyone else. Usually they get ‘help’ from glowies and are pushed into these situations by terminally online degenerates.
Conflating actual physical fighters with fucking school shooters is the most insane thing I’ve heard just this day, but I’m sure I’ll hear more to come as progress.
AryanSuperSoldier said:
It’s extremely far off. Most school shooters are basically anxious bullied and drugged up incels raised by single moms who take out all their pent up resentment on everyone else. Usually they get ‘help’ from glowies and are pushed into these situations by terminally online degenerates.
Conflating actual physical fighters with fucking school shooters is the most insane thing I’ve heard just this day, but I’m sure I’ll hear more to come as progress.
How the fuck did we go from school shooters to UFC fighters?? Before that it was debating retards on a porn site.
WERE DOING THIS ON A FORUM POST ABOUT SOMEBODYS FANTASY ABOUT A POLYGAMIC VILLAGE HARAM.
Oh and yeah... we're on a porn site with focus on raceplay...
Did the inventors of the internet ever thought about this scenario?
the_polbwcV2 said:
How the fuck did we go from school shooters to UFC fighters?? Before that it was debating retards on a porn site.
WERE DOING THIS ON A FORUM POST ABOUT SOMEBODYS FANTASY ABOUT A POLYGAMIC VILLAGE HARAM.Oh and yeah... we're on a porn site with focus on raceplay...
Did the inventors of the internet ever thought about this scenario?
>BleachBooru Forums
That's cause half the people on this site are terminally online leftist/centrist into a taboo kink and the other half are terminally online right wing dissident autists who consume 90% edgy internet politics while also finding anime girls sexy.
fkiblaze said:
>BleachBooru Forums
That's cause half the people on this site are terminally online leftist/centrist into a taboo kink and the other half are terminally online right wing dissident autists who consume 90% edgy internet politics while also finding anime girls sexy.
The only thing that unites us is our motherfucking sexual drive.
This is the best example of how strong the human sexuality is.
fkiblaze said:
Id just like to point out polygamy doesn't actually help the white race, because women as obviously stated are the reproductive bottle neck, one man with multiple wives means less women for other men to have kids with. The way you would have more white people is like having 20 kids with one wife, not having 20 kids with 10 wives each having 2 kids as that is no different than them marrying 10 men and having 2 kids themselves.
He should go for girls who we wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole and give them 3 or 4 kids each. It's still bad, even then, though. To mitigate the damage further, he needs to make sure he takes girls the rest of us would avoid.
That said i dont think Christianity explicitly forbids polygamy. It literally just says what the old testament says, if you are a priest or a church leader you can only have 1 wife. It says nothing about the common man who isnt a priest. The fact that it says priests should only have one wife kinda implies non-priests can have more than one tbh. That said, it sounds like you should look into orthodox Christianity if you want what you expected the church to give in terms of a community. Im not really a fan of Catholicism. If you want traditional christianity that's orthodox, if you beleive all that matters is what the bible says, then be protestant.
Then there's the New Testament bro. In Matthew 19, Christ says that a marriage is between two people, one man and one woman. Teaching you why polygamy is wrong is very important, however, and the OT is full of stories about how more than one wife will ruin your life.
TheTribe said:
Hello,First post here, getting my feet wet. Been lurking some and have come to the realization that this site appears to have a religious … namely Catholic bend? At least some users which I find curious. People on a porn site, and forum, promoting Catholicism? Curious behavior. I was raised such but it does not appear to have the benefits I once believed it to have. Sure it helped me source and select a wife, but the church we attend is average age 40+ and doesn’t have the community my parents go on about, where they used to watch each others kids. Inb4, start the program! I was involved and became heavily disillusioned with the church while I was participating weekly, multiple times a week. I came to the realization a universal church would never be the solution for “OUR” people.
Catholicism has reached an extreme point of dominance among White nationalist groups lately. It's a miracle, and I can only speculate as to how God did it. I think one big cause is the political conflict between the Church and Joe Biden. Roman Catholicism being designated as a hate group and now holding the status of "largest hate group in the United States and the world" is one of the wildest things, but it's definitely making White nationalists more Catholic. Maybe the fact boomer priests are dying out and being replaced by more conservative clergy is helping, and maybe the fact White zoomer guys can increasingly drive to a more conservative parish if the local priest seems too liberal. While Catholicism does accept non-Whites as well, the fact Catholicism has been against White genocide and CRT is also a factor in its growth among our people.
Now to the topic at hand, polygamy and building the village. We live in an insanely isolated society. I have friends, I am not some weirdo hanging out in a basement but my very normal friends have no apparent intention of marrying or having children … maybe I am the weirdo for marrying and having children, of which I want many more. What are we men of the west to do? When the wider society has abandoned the need to marry and breed is it not the responsibility of those with the foresight to know it’s important to raise up our own village and army of youngsters?
Has anyone here experimented with this? Does anyone have advice or a take on how to build that community? Sites for finding more sister wives? I have all the infrastructure I believe I need, multiple houses, good job, now comes the struggle of finding the right members to add to my village. Where would you look for women (of most import, as women tend to be the limiting factor in having children) but also quality men ready to live like slaves so our children’s children can one day be free?
Hail Victory, Hail our Tribe.
I feel like you saw the early seasons of Sister Wives and want to recreate the cute mormon village where the kids are all living in different houses with different wives and the husband moves between houses regularly as the head of each house after the dude went crazy, sold the entire village, stopped having sex with all of them except one, and forced all of his wives to get their own jobs except the one who he kept as he transitioned to de facto monogamy.
If you have enough houses and money, I'd recommend just finding them on tinder and saying "I'm a polygamist and need extra women to breed. Women who want 3+ kids only" or something.
AryanBreeder8 said:
Then there's the New Testament bro. In Matthew 19, Christ says that a marriage is between two people, one man and one woman. Teaching you why polygamy is wrong is very important, however, and the OT is full of stories about how more than one wife will ruin your life
Mathew 19 is about divorce. Christ says that because of the hardness of your hearts Moses allowed divorce but it wasn't original that way. He says nothing on multiple wives. Don't get me wrong, I don't think polygamy is the ideal, as God only made one wife for Adam, but he also permitted men later on to have multiple wives. Abraham, and so on. Never in the bible does it mention polygamy as a sin, old testament or new testament.
fkiblaze said:
Mathew 19 is about divorce. Christ says that because of the hardness of your hearts Moses allowed divorce but it wasn't original that way. He says nothing on multiple wives. Don't get me wrong, I don't think polygamy is the ideal, as God only made one wife for Adam, but he also permitted men later on to have multiple wives. Abraham, and so on. Never in the bible does it mention polygamy as a sin, old testament or new testament.
Yes, when Christ says two people, one husband and one wife, are joined together as one couple and must not be separated, people often notice that it is about divorce. However, Christ doesn't say "one husband and any number of wives" or similar. He says one husband and one wife. There is a meaning to this. He did not need to say it as He said it, yet He chose to emphasize monogamy in this passage.
AryanBreeder8 said:
Yes, when Christ says two people, one husband and one wife, are joined together as one couple and must not be separated, people often notice that it is about divorce. However, Christ doesn't say "one husband and any number of wives" or similar. He says one husband and one wife. There is a meaning to this. He did not need to say it as He said it, yet He chose to emphasize monogamy in this passage.
Nothing in the verse implies you can only have one wife. Him using a general description of a marriage involving a husband and wife doesn't exempt the husband marrying another. If anything, it can be inferred that it is allowed. He says "So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate." If two becomes one flesh, you can infer that implies that "one flesh" can marry another just as it did before, because if "one flesh" was able to marry a woman, when it becomes one flesh again, why would it be different a second time? And I don't think God would have Abraham do something that was a sin. The general concept, too, is that Christ freed us from the old testament mosaic law, but not even if the mosaic law was multiple wives forbidden, yet it did forbid things like eating shellfish and pig, so if anything having more than 1 wife is not even as "unclean" as eating shrimp. Once again, I'm not saying the ideal isn't to have only one wife, I'm just saying it's not forbidden to have more than one. Why else would the new testament keep the "lesbian exception" that the old testament had if not for both of your wives to be in bed together.
LatinaOfHearts said:
So if we're using those passages to justify male polygamy, we could also use them to justify female polygamy.. which is something no man seems to like but we should be ok with it being done to us.
That would be polyandry, and the reason no one really argue for it except for feminists is because of biology. 9 months to wait for a baby is a long time to then ‘get your turn’ if your in a polyandrous relationship. Most guys see it as essentially a form of cuckoldry, I mean depending on how many men are with one woman, you’re all gonna be supporting each others kids and that’s if the woman is ‘fair’ and has children with each of the men (which is so unbelievably doubtful and uncharacteristic), whereas in polygamy it’s less so effecting to both the men and the women. All in all though, monogamy is superior for creating fair and stable relationships and then also societies.