Posted under General
LatinaOfHearts said:
I find that people need to breed with whoever they want but if your goal is complete racial purity then yeah sure.. I have my opinions on white girls and whoever but that's another story.
What kind of opinions are those? I'm interested in hearing ab out them
SneakyNazi said:
What kind of opinions are those? I'm interested in hearing ab out them
Most white girls are way too incompatible with white men to even be worth it. They're leftists, extreme feminists (women>men kind), don't want to have or raise children, are not following any kind of religion outside of partying religiously etc. I think white women were once the perfect compliment to white men but lust, greed, selfishness and cock hunger has corrupted them to a point of no return.
LatinaOfHearts said:
Most white girls are way too incompatible with white men to even be worth it. They're leftists, extreme feminists (women>men kind), don't want to have or raise children, are not following any kind of religion outside of partying religiously etc. I think white women were once the perfect compliment to white men but lust, greed, selfishness and cock hunger has corrupted them to a point of no return.
Yeah, you’re not wrong. I think it’s more to do with first world problems and the issues of decadence (that is the slow gradual decline of an otherwise healthy and powerful society) than just the fact the woman is white. Like Eastern European white women that live in ‘based’ Eastern European countries are still top notch if you have a discerning eye (of course you’d need to be careful with any potential spouse), because of all the expected reasons. Namely being more traditional and religious. I still believe though that eventually due to women’s unearned privileges that all women that get power and status enough to be ‘self sufficient’ will do exactly what western women are doing now. ie destroying the bedrock of civilisation haha
LatinaOfHearts said:
Most white girls are way too incompatible with white men to even be worth it. They're leftists, extreme feminists (women>men kind), don't want to have or raise children, are not following any kind of religion outside of partying religiously etc. I think white women were once the perfect compliment to white men but lust, greed, selfishness and cock hunger has corrupted them to a point of no return.
True. But that could also have to do with the rise of liberalism and feminism while having also declining traditional values. Although I do wonder if your opinion is also clouded by your own kink? I mean you would have it in your best interest to steer white men away from white women
AryanSuperSoldier said:
Yeah, you’re not wrong. I think it’s more to do with first world problems and the issues of decadence (that is the slow gradual decline of an otherwise healthy and powerful society) than just the fact the woman is white. Like Eastern European white women that live in ‘based’ Eastern European countries are still top notch if you have a discerning eye (of course you’d need to be careful with any potential spouse), because of all the expected reasons. Namely being more traditional and religious. I still believe though that eventually due to women’s unearned privileges that all women that get power and status enough to be ‘self sufficient’ will do exactly what western women are doing now. ie destroying the bedrock of civilisation haha
SneakyNazi said:
True. But that could also have to do with the rise of liberalism and feminism while having also declining traditional values. Although I do wonder if your opinion is also clouded by your own kink? I mean you would have it in your best interest to steer white men away from white women
Yea, i mean, white women are messed up, but so are pretty much every other women to even more degrees. All other women are far less conservative if you go by voting records at least. White women are the only ones that are at least 50% right wing, 50% left wing.
LatinaOfHearts said:
I mean the only bloodline you're ruining is yours ngl 😭
You do have a point, anytime I hear about mixed people, they tend to look like their ethnic parent more than their white parent. Doesn't mean that they can't be whitepassing or be born fully white, it is possible but it is unlikely. I remember watching a YouTube video of a black lady who apparently gave birth to a white child and pretty much debunked every myth such as "Your husband cheated on you with a white woman!", then there was some Flipina chick from a TikTok screenshot on 4chan in which she gave birth to a white baby because she had sperm donated to her. Dunno if they're telling the truth but yet again, I have poor memory so take it with a grain of salt.
somebleacheduser said:
You do have a point, anytime I hear about mixed people, they tend to look like their ethnic parent more than their white parent. Doesn't mean that they can't be whitepassing or be born fully white, it is possible but it is unlikely. I remember watching a YouTube video of a black lady who apparently gave birth to a white child and pretty much debunked every myth such as "Your husband cheated on you with a white woman!", then there was some Flipina chick from a TikTok screenshot on 4chan in which she gave birth to a white baby because she had sperm donated to her. Dunno if they're telling the truth but yet again, I have poor memory so take it with a grain of salt.
As far as public people go, I know Brittany Venti had a black mother and she looks mostly white. It's the same deal as that black mother. It's cause most black people are partly white all ready, so when a 50% african and 50% european person has a kid with a 100% european, the 75% european kid can look pretty white and will usually just have 1 or two black features, like hair or nose.
fkiblaze said:
As far as public people go, I know Brittany Venti had a black mother and she looks mostly white. It's the same deal as that black mother. It's cause most black people are partly white all ready, so when a 50% african and 50% european person has a kid with a 100% european, the 75% european kid can look pretty white and will usually just have 1 or two black features, like hair or nose.
I heard about that; Because of slavery and other reasons outside of it as well as ancestors, black people are mixed in a way. That's the reason why I see lightskinned people and your example. It's pretty interesting how one can get a Pinkpantherss type of mixed (her mom was Kenyan Luo and her dad was white English* her mom is probably a pure type of Kenyan so the singer looked like her mom mostly), then you get that Venti chick (yet again WMBF but black women in the west are like you said partly white so Venti came out more white). Genetics can be very fascinating.
somebleacheduser said:
I heard about that; Because of slavery and other reasons outside of it as well as ancestors, black people are mixed in a way. That's the reason why I see lightskinned people and your example. It's pretty interesting how one can get a Pinkpantherss type of mixed (her mom was Kenyan Luo and her dad was white English* her mom is probably a pure type of Kenyan so the singer looked like her mom mostly), then you get that Venti chick (yet again WMBF but black women in the west are like you said partly white so Venti came out more white). Genetics can be very fascinating.
Yea, if you look at 100% african people, like migrants fresh off the boat, they generally look way blacker than the average african american. The average african American is around 15%-20% white from what i heard. as for genetics, if one person is 50% white, and they have a child with a 100% white person, the child is able to be anything from 50% to 100% white. 75% is just the average, and either fully white or 50% white are like only a 1 in a trillion chance if not higher. I dont know the exact calculations but it would be 1/2^(n) with n being the amount of genes between the white and black person.
Updated
I'm going to have to study history and genetics, it's some pretty fascinating things I hear and learn every day. If I can finish video games in less than a week, I have plenty of time to learn.
On topic: Continuing where I left off: I don't think any sane person would get turned on by actual racism, the only ones who do are unironic sadists as well as very sick people in general like those BNWOfags who get off to watching white as well as non-black people getting hurt and murdered and in very extreme cases: watching CAM (child abuse material) and as well get off to dead corpses of minors. In my opinion (this is common sense), be better than your opponents, don't be the type fapping to people getting murdered or hurt: That's some serial killer behavior and it doesn't make you any better than them.
somebleacheduser said:
I'm going to have to study history and genetics, it's some pretty fascinating things I hear and learn every day. If I can finish video games in less than a week, I have plenty of time to learn.
Genetics and evolutionary theory are IMO one of the most important topic to understand human society and politics, because it's obvious the basis for the human species. The lack of understanding of genetics and evolution is one of the main reasons the west is as messed up as it is.
guppy969 said:
I don't just mean being turned on by bleached art and what not. Does racism and/or antisemitism in general make you aroused? When you hear reports of black people being mistreated or jews getting attacked, does it make you feel pleasure? Does seeing neo nazis protesting and harassing niggers and jews in public give you a feeling of euphoria?
No. Wtf? Don't get me wrong, I'm a proudly anti-jew because of their evil religious beliefs, but it's not arousing to me.
SneakyNazi said:
True. But that could also have to do with the rise of liberalism and feminism while having also declining traditional values. Although I do wonder if your opinion is also clouded by your own kink? I mean you would have it in your best interest to steer white men away from white women
I guess so? But I've never seen a asian pro palestinian protestor, or a hapa girl complaining about "white hetero cis men" or a latina crying about how women who vote "far right" should just die and get raped. It's always white women that favor and promote these ideologies.. and not at all! I'd much rather white men date proper white women than me, after all my only interest is seeing the white race prosper.
LatinaOfHearts said:
I guess so? But I've never seen a asian pro palestinian protestor, or a hapa girl complaining about "white hetero cis men" or a latina crying about how women who vote "far right" should just die and get raped. It's always white women that favor and promote these ideologies.. and not at all! I'd much rather white men date proper white women than me, after all my only interest is seeing the white race prosper.
That cause whiteliberals are the only group that has an outgroup bias. Idk if you seen those graphs from studies but every other group as they get more democratic/leftwing they get more ethnocentric/ingroup bias. White are the only group of people that are the reverse. We get more ethnocentric/in group bias the more republican/conservative we are and the lefty whites go so far in the other direction they like their group less than other groups. This is mainly do to how western politics is set up though imo.
fkiblaze said:
That cause whiteliberals are the only group that has an outgroup bias. Idk if you seen those graphs from studies but every other group as they get more democratic/leftwing they get more ethnocentric/ingroup bias. White are the only group of people that are the reverse. We get more ethnocentric/in group bias the more republican/conservative we are and the lefty whites go so far in the other direction they like their group less than other groups. This is mainly do to how western politics is set up though imo.
Yeah I don’t think it has anything to do with whites being somehow drastically different (they are in some ways but not this particular way). Whites have on avg more trait openness which might contribute a little to why the more liberal whites get, the less ethnocentric they become, but it shouldn’t be THIS exaggerated. I think it’s just what non-whites in white/western/European countries do to gain political power. Basically, the white liberals then have to distance themselves from their Republican/conservative counterparts to curry favour with their non-white liberal allies. And the similar happens in reverse for non-whites who are more conservative and are sympathetic to the right leaning whites remaining.
AryanSuperSoldier said:
Yeah I don’t think it has anything to do with whites being somehow drastically different (they are in some ways but not this particular way). Whites have on avg more trait openness which might contribute a little to why the more liberal whites get, the less ethnocentric they become, but it shouldn’t be THIS exaggerated. I think it’s just what non-whites in white/western/European countries do to gain political power. Basically, the white liberals then have to distance themselves from their Republican/conservative counterparts to curry favour with their non-white liberal allies. And the similar happens in reverse for non-whites who are more conservative and are sympathetic to the right leaning whites remaining.
White people are the only race of people that have the gene most responsible for individualism in the majority of the people. That itself could be an explanation, like us being the only majority individualist race. Or it could just be the Jewish explanation with their subversion being most effective on us cause jews pass as white for the average person, where as if they tried that in china or somewhere it wouldnt work cause they dont look asian. The issue about it being about pandering to non-whites is that the trend is actually opposite. In more lilly white places and when countries were more white, the xenophilia was stronger. As places get flood with immigrants, whites become more ethnocentric. There is no reason to pander to a group when they were only less than 5% of the population or whatever.
fkiblaze said:
White people are the only race of people that have the gene most responsible for individualism in the majority of the people. That itself could be an explanation, like us being the only majority individualist race. Or it could just be the Jewish explanation with their subversion being most effective on us cause jews pass as white for the average person, where as if they tried that in china or somewhere it wouldnt work cause they dont look asian. The issue about it being about pandering to non-whites is that the trend is actually opposite. In more lilly white places and when countries were more white, the xenophilia was stronger. As places get flood with immigrants, whites become more ethnocentric. There is no reason to pander to a group when they were only less than 5% of the population or whatever.
The ethnocentrism makes sense when the non-white population is so minuscule as barely 5% of the population, even if they inhabit a small but dense area, but as it grows and as the diverse populations of non-whites become more numerous and enfranchised the current white liberals imo do what I just described. Because they see the non-whites as essentially useful idiots to be quite honest. The conservative whites though would get much more ethnocentric than they already were though as a response.
AryanSuperSoldier said:
The ethnocentrism makes sense when the non-white population is so minuscule as barely 5% of the population, even if they inhabit a small but dense area, but as it grows and as the diverse populations of non-whites become more numerous and enfranchised the current white liberals imo do what I just described. Because they see the non-whites as essentially useful idiots to be quite honest. The conservative whites though would get much more ethnocentric than they already were though as a response.
But like i said, there is no benefit for them to be xenophilic and want to import non-whites or give them special treatment when they are a small minority. The non-whites arent "useful idiots" for liberal whites, they are only useful idiots for the elites, manly the jewish elite. non-whites see liberal whites with disdain and disrespect, not as white saviors. The old left would pander to the white working class, like old style democrats and labor in the UK. that was what the useful pandering was. But then those groups specifically changed the demographics and betrayed the working class whites.
