Hate Bleached Liberals(?)

GorgeWBussy said:

Because they are. I don’t remember the title, but I remember seeing a similar video about Cars on my feed by one “Jack Saint”. I haven’t watched his videos, but he seems to specialize in this sort of buffoonery. And there was a CNN article written about 7 years ago stating that Paw Patrol was fascist.

Which further illustrates my point. Trying to make a sexual fetish into a political statement makes you no better than these people. You’re trying to equate watching porn with white guys in it to being an actual Nazi.

If Hitler could come into the present day and see that the relevance of his “ideology” has devolved into people editing swastikas onto Japanese cartoon girls and jacking off to them, he would kill himself. A second time.

He'd kill many others first...

Zel said:

I don't really have a term for it, but all I can think to call them is Bleached Liberals.

I don't understand why, but I really really hate the kind of people who willingly will long onto this site and then complain about NS or Right Wing iconography or racial degredation. (From at least my perspective) Bleached as a concept is inherently right wing and to come onto the capital website for all bleached content on the internet and just complain about it pisses me off. Get a new kink or something idfk. Anybody share these thoughts?

Bleached is not inherently about right-wing politics. It is about women praising White men and White men praising women of all colors. Go to the Queen of Hearts Booru and the Reddit community and you will see that politics are largely absent from most posts. Nowadays here almost every page has at least one post containing Nazi iconography. I wish you guys would find a different website but many of the admins are Neo-Nazis as well so that's why I don't complain often. Still, I have more agreement with you guys than people who are into Bl*cked. I think most of those people are just disgusting people who are actually mentally ill.

Edit: I also hope you don't actually "hate" anyone. That's a lot of wasted emotional investment for strangers on the internet who are indifferent to what you think or feel.

Modality said:

Yeah, I noticed this too. Bleached is an inherently pro-White kink, so if you are going to be in the community you don't get to complain about symbols that represent that.

Also, isn't there a whole other booru for "tamer" bleached stuff? Just send them there or tell them to go back to reddit.

If there is, I'd appreciate if you told me about it. I don't like Reddit because I don't want them in my email inbox or contributing to something I view is killing the internet. All I know of is qohbooru and they've been inactive for a long time now.

I have a complex relationship with this topic. I come from a left wing background and was raised to view all people as equal. Yet I can't deny some sort of inherent appeal towards celebrating white people and their superiority. I see a beautiful white woman, white civilization, and can't deny that something in my blood yearns to call that superior.

whiteeuphoria said:

I have a complex relationship with this topic. I come from a left wing background and was raised to view all people as equal. Yet I can't deny some sort of inherent appeal towards celebrating white people and their superiority. I see a beautiful white woman, white civilization, and can't deny that something in my blood yearns to call that superior.

That's probably inbreed-play if you yarn to sexually celebrate your own bloodline.

Both blacked and bleached are raceplay kink. Blacked with everyone else exterminated is inbreed play, same apply with Bleached. You need multiple race for raceplay

Just remember you can never hate liberals as much as they hate themselves, and BLEACHED Liberals... is their final stage.

ZombiBoi said:

Just remember you can never hate liberals as much as they hate themselves, and BLEACHED Liberals... is their final stage.

"You're not supposed to quote Putin word-by-word but act as proper black woman MAGA supporter... damn you Dimitri!"

Aakord said:

"You're not supposed to quote Putin word-by-word but act as proper black woman MAGA supporter... damn you Dimitri!"

I think the proper phrasing is "word-for-word"

How is it even possible to be a bleached liberal anyway?

Loving yourself and your race when you're white is a foreign concept to them. And for the non-whites libtard subs here, well they're taught to hate and blame whites for pretty much any reason, how could they become bleached in the first place? There's a paradox, it's just impossible

Reading the comments here seems a lot are still heavily brainwashed and indoctrinated opinions of a one sided picture of nazi germany that was hammered into you since you were born from media and education. The state of pre hitler germany resembled much of societies today in shambles ,degeneracy and foreign elites manipulation at detriment of locals.
Nazis werent just mass eradicating anyone of different race or a slight genetic mix...

Look at what Europe has turned to today:
UK over 250k underaged white children sexually assaulted ,some brutally raped and burned alive by paki muslims gangs , while the police and gov didnt do its job to avoid being racist and stir racial tensions...
Sweden despite being minorities these coloured immigrants commit 60% of convicted rapes and mass violent crime
Same case over all of europe skyrocket in violent crime, sexual abuse of women and kids
Once great cultural megaliths societies turning into shitholes , has even been to France ?go off main turist tracks and its dirty, poluted ,smells like piss, coloureds stalking or giving women the 'i would rape you if u didnt have someone to protect you' looks...
blacks ,muslims love stalking white women waiting for the chance shes alone.

They are pouring more immigrants on locals everywhere that dont want it at rates where majority is shifting to non locals.
This is the BAD END for Europe and white civilization, not the nazis. Literal replacement by primitive feral apes that wont assimilate or integrate into local culture but seek to conquer it.

Also GO watch ' EUROPA : THE LAST BATTLE '

I prefer my porn lore real world accurate . Thanks for reading my ted talk

Theres a lot of interesting information on X on this and lovely aethestic edits ,explore the rabbit hole at least to have less of a biased one sided perspective, more are awakening to facts and post war propaganda fiction machine.

I prefer my porn lore real world accurate . Thanks for reading my ted talk

The problem is you go about it by headcannoning the real world to be accurate to your kink.

One might wonder, "Why are there so many racists in the bleached community?"

First, it's important to note that racists tend to thrive in bleached communities where moderation and tolerance are lacking. It's not just about the appeal of kink; it's about the space granted to a small group that would otherwise be ostracized and banned. This applies equally to both bleached and blacked communities: racist individuals come in all skin tones. We're talking about narcissists who struggle with their own ego issues and prefer self-indulgence over seeking therapy.

Who Are the Interracial Subs Seeking "Real Racists"?

Now, who are the interracial subs looking for "real racists" in bleached communities? It's clear that this discussion can also apply to other racial kinks like blacked. At first glance, it might seem that if there are subs, it could legitimize racist dominants. However, this isn't about interracial kink; it's about bigoted kink. The fundamental idea behind xenophilic interracial kink for a dominant male is simply... well, having sex with someone of a different race—something that contradicts the logic of a racist. Yet, hypocrisy and bigotry often go hand in hand. Thus, a pro-racism sub in bleached or blacked contexts is nothing more than a sub engaged in "hypocritical-bigotry" kink.

I hope this, pretty much, cover the most. As for the calling "liberals", it relative to the locked mindset of the people naming it. For maga right-wingbtrash, xenophilia (and thus bleached) is sort of extreme left-wing stuff. For the nazi (they would place themselves in the center), xenophilia would be extreme-right anarchism. While in communist dictatorships xenophilic raceplay would be seen as western degradation.

A kink is a kink. There are no political decline such as (as previously said) being spanked in a nun in latex is not a religious thing. Bleached raceplay, as xenophilia, is as much as liberal as ancient romans were (they were not liberal, in case you missed class that day)

Aakord said:

One might wonder, "Why are there so many racists in the bleached community?"

First, it's important to note that racists tend to thrive in bleached communities where moderation and tolerance are lacking. It's not just about the appeal of kink; it's about the space granted to a small group that would otherwise be ostracized and banned. This applies equally to both bleached and blacked communities: racist individuals come in all skin tones. We're talking about narcissists who struggle with their own ego issues and prefer self-indulgence over seeking therapy.

Who Are the Interracial Subs Seeking "Real Racists"?

Now, who are the interracial subs looking for "real racists" in bleached communities? It's clear that this discussion can also apply to other racial kinks like blacked. At first glance, it might seem that if there are subs, it could legitimize racist dominants. However, this isn't about interracial kink; it's about bigoted kink. The fundamental idea behind xenophilic interracial kink for a dominant male is simply... well, having sex with someone of a different race—something that contradicts the logic of a racist. Yet, hypocrisy and bigotry often go hand in hand. Thus, a pro-racism sub in bleached or blacked contexts is nothing more than a sub engaged in "hypocritical-bigotry" kink.

I hope this, pretty much, cover the most. As for the calling "liberals", it relative to the locked mindset of the people naming it. For maga right-wingbtrash, xenophilia (and thus bleached) is sort of extreme left-wing stuff. For the nazi (they would place themselves in the center), xenophilia would be extreme-right anarchism. While in communist dictatorships xenophilic raceplay would be seen as western degradation.

A kink is a kink. There are no political decline such as (as previously said) being spanked in a nun in latex is not a religious thing. Bleached raceplay, as xenophilia, is as much as liberal as ancient romans were (they were not liberal, in case you missed class that day)

is this written by a retarded jewish AI bot?
Racism is evolutionary and natural mechanic of tribe survival and preference as well as backed by genome race science.
Most of the world if u actually traveled is racist to some degree.
If you're not racist at all that means u are an evolutionary failure and indoctrinated moron.

RealRacist said:
Racism is evolutionary and natural mechanic of tribe survival and preference as well as backed by genome race science.

Not exactly, but close enough that I'm not gonna challenge it (except the backed by genome race science part, if you mean that racism is backed up by science, you don't understand how science works)

RealRacist said:
Most of the world if u actually traveled is racist to some degree.

That is actually very true, specially when you travel outside of the developed world, but not exclusively, the developed world can also be insanely racist/xenophobic, Japan for example has no-gaijin restaurant where they straight up won't let you in, can you imagine no-foreigners restaurants in the US? It's bonkers

RealRacist said:
If you're not racist at all that means u are an evolutionary failure and indoctrinated moron.

This is the most insane conclusion one could draw from those two premises. For starters, those two things are completely incompatible, "an evolutionary failure and an indoctrinated moron"? Which is it? Is it their "bad" genes that are making them not racist? Or is it a learned behavior (indoctrination)? If it's a genetically induced behavior, they wouldn't need to be indoctrinated, and if it's because their were indoctrinated, that means they were naturally racist, but taught not to be, can't be both.

And second, we are more and more escaping evolution (at least in the conventional sense), for example, people living in cold areas don't develop thick coats of fur over generations, we are the apex predator, and we've banded together to conquer nature and make it our bitch, that's like the entire point of being human. An appeal to naturalism argument like this one doesn't make sense anymore, not being racist is not an evolutionary failure, it's going beyond evolution, it's surpassing our primate roots.

Zel said:

I don't really have a term for it, but all I can think to call them is Bleached Liberals.

I don't understand why, but I really really hate the kind of people who willingly will long onto this site and then complain about NS or Right Wing iconography or racial degredation. (From at least my perspective) Bleached as a concept is inherently right wing and to come onto the capital website for all bleached content on the internet and just complain about it pisses me off. Get a new kink or something idfk. Anybody share these thoughts?

As someone you'd call a liberal (I'm a leftist, not a liberal, but that's irrelevant to the point I'm making), I would never complain about any of that, it makes no sense for people like me to complain about it. We left-of-center folks have accepted this is a kink, a fantasy that has nothing to do with who we are in real life, regular bleaching is aready crossing the taboo line for us, nazi shit being even more wrong only makes it hotter. Think about it, if we were going to complain, why complain only about that? We'd be complaining about pretty much every image, but we don't, because when we come here looking for images, we're adopt different personas. As for who might be actually complaining, there are a few possibilities:

1- Idiotic liberals that are at war with their own kink and struggle to separate fantasy from reality (rare, but I'm sure there are some)
2- People who don't have this kink at all. Maybe they do have some interracial kink and are here to see some interracial images and are put off by white supremacy (for those folks, sorry, this is not the board for you, either leave us be and find somewhere else, or get for what you're looking for in silence and don't bother us, search filters exist for a reason), or just people who aren't here to see the images at all and just come here to complain (real, actual negative IQ)
3- Right wingers for whom the regular bleached stuff is not just a fantasy at all, but their real ideology, but that think nazi shit is a step too far. Might seem farfetched, but think about it, unlike us lefties, they don't have to adopt a persona when they come here, so if they see an image that goes "too far", they might complain. Not saying this is what's happening, just that it is one possibility.

EDIT: In case it wasn't clear, my money is on option 2.

Hope that clears it up, I, as a non-racist, I hope to see more niggers, spics, chinks and every other kind of inferior wear swastikas as a mark of their acceptance of our superiority, then maybe I'll reward them with my BWC.

Marcal91 said:

This is the most insane conclusion one could draw from those two premises. For starters, those two things are completely incompatible, "an evolutionary failure and an indoctrinated moron"? Which is it? Is it their "bad" genes that are making them not racist? Or is it a learned behavior (indoctrination)? If it's a genetically induced behavior, they wouldn't need to be indoctrinated, and if it's because their were indoctrinated, that means they were naturally racist, but taught not to be, can't be both.

No, he's right. It is both. Being susceptible to propaganda against your own ingroup is "bad genes." Genetics is responsible to your reaction to propaganda in general, but even more so to more hardwired things. For instance, some people are " super comformists" who accept whatever the social norm or authority says, eg those people that got like 5 booster shots for covid, some people are just "comformist" and have normal susceptiblity to propaganda, eg those people that got 1 vaccine but no boosters, some people are unneffected by propaganda, eg those people that were just apolitical during covid and didnt get a vaccine or care to argue about them, and just minded their own buisness, some people are "contrarians" or "anti-authorities" that are predisposed against propaganda, eg people that spoke out against the vaccine, and lastly some people are "super-contrarians" eg those people that not only think the vaccine is bad, but also the moon landing is fake, the earth is flat, 5g is brainwashing, and the opposite of every other establishment position, too.

And second, we are more and more escaping evolution (at least in the conventional sense), for example, people living in cold areas don't develop thick coats of fur over generations, we are the apex predator, and we've banded together to conquer nature and make it our bitch, that's like the entire point of being human. An appeal to naturalism argument like this one doesn't make sense anymore, not being racist is not an evolutionary failure, it's going beyond evolution, it's surpassing our primate roots.

We arent escaping evolution one bit at all. We are still under it just as much as we were a milliom years ago. Humans just have a different evolutionary niche than most other animals. Ours is intelligence, we dont grow fur for cold, we make clothes. We dont grow bigger claws, we make better swords, etc

fkiblaze said:

Being susceptible to propaganda against your own ingroup is "bad genes."

First, succeptibility to propaganda is more about education and how you were raised than genetics. Not saying it has nothing to do with it, but it's overwhelmingly more about education and about being taught what to look for. Second, being non-racist is not propaganda against your own ingroup, now there are people who will fall for propaganda and become racist against their own group, I've seen it happen, and that IS a failure in their education (not their genes).

fkiblaze said:
We arent escaping evolution one bit at all. We are still under it just as much as we were a milliom years ago. Humans just have a different evolutionary niche than most other animals. Ours is intelligence, we dont grow fur for cold, we make clothes. We dont grow bigger claws, we make better swords, etc

That's why I added the "in the traditional sense" bit. It's not only the shit we make, it's our ability to form complex societies and care for our "weak", people that wouldn't survive alone no matter how smart they were, but that in a society they could provide valuable contributions.