Bleachbooru

Approval

Posted under General

the_polbwcV2 said:

THEN EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT THE FUCK THIS IS:

post #68126
post #68127

Also, im gonna kick some fucking heads off if anybody comes with some bullshit excuses like "other sites do it to0!!" or "Its loli!! They are 2239939 years old!!"
This site has a pedo problem and im tired of shutting my mouth while we have mods who dont do jack shit right.

Just cause a rule exist doesnt mean it's 100% enforced. The mods also allow bad quality posts sometimes, too. But the rule is lolicon is allowed pedophilia is not. Yes there is a difference.

Kisama said:

What's not allowed are 3DCG loli and toddlercon, as clearly stated in the rules. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the pics you linked.

Here's what's wrong with it: it is absolute garbage, and having jannies chew other people out for "not finding the opacity slider" is objectively retarded when insert-tool Microsoft Word boxes read "Age: 12" confirming this is pedo-posting.

If it's Wild West rules, fine, but then at least we can have jannies that have the decency to not act like they're hot shit, do their job, and keep their mouths shut.

Cassidy said:

Here's what's wrong with it: it is absolute garbage, and having jannies chew other people out for "not finding the opacity slider" is objectively retarded when insert-tool Microsoft Word boxes read "Age: 12" confirming this is pedo-posting.

If it's Wild West rules, fine, but then at least we can have jannies that have the decency to not act like they're hot shit, do their job, and keep their mouths shut.

yea, my understanding of acceptable loli content is the typical "all characters are 18 or older despite appearances", but who knows, maybe they are going by technical terms where it's "actually it's hebephilia!!!" posting since pedo technically refers to prepubescent. That said the moral quality of the picture isnt the same thing as the quality of the edit, so that isn't contradiction.

WE SHOULDN'T HAVE THIS CONVERSATION

THIS IS JUST FUCKED UP AND EVERYBODX WHO THINKS THIS IS FINE IS ACTUALLY A RETARDED MOTHERFUCKER AND A PEDO.

If we really discuss about exact definitions on this booru then there is something very wrong.

I'm actually pissed off at this bullshit. Actually good posts are getting dissaproved by some bullshit reason while open pedophilia is fucking allowed. This Booru is gonna get fucked eventually when this bullshit comes out.
Fucking retarded bullshit

fkiblaze said:

Just cause a rule exist doesnt mean it's 100% enforced. The mods also allow bad quality posts sometimes, too. But the rule is lolicon is allowed pedophilia is not. Yes there is a difference.

There is bullshit difference between loli and pedophilia ON THIS WEBSITE

post #78574
post #20504

These comments are just fucking disgusting.
And the post themselves depict small schoolchildren.

the_polbwcV2 said:

WE SHOULDN'T HAVE THIS CONVERSATION

THIS IS JUST FUCKED UP AND EVERYBODX WHO THINKS THIS IS FINE IS ACTUALLY A RETARDED MOTHERFUCKER AND A PEDO.

If we really discuss about exact definitions on this booru then there is something very wrong.

I'm actually pissed off at this bullshit. Actually good posts are getting dissaproved by some bullshit reason while open pedophilia is fucking allowed. This Booru is gonna get fucked eventually when this bullshit comes out.
Fucking retarded bullshit

Ive never seen even the worst mods disprove a good post. The worst case scenario are like generic average posts that add nothing interesting but aren't hot garbage, either, but no actual posts id ever bother liking let alone favoriting. And this is a porn site, they already banned straight up CG stuff, calm down about drawing. There is plenty of faggotry drawings here, too which is also immoral. And im not just defending mods, on the old site there was one i particularly thought was terrible, but even he never removed anything i would like, just stuff that in no way violated the rules.

the_polbwcV2 said:

There is bullshit difference between loli and pedophilia ON THIS WEBSITE

post #78574
post #20504

These comments are just fucking disgusting.
And the post themselves depict small schoolchildren.

Once again, read Hana's post. You aren't suppose to make pedophiliac comments. But once again, it's not like this place has AI enforcement. And ive seen plenty of loli posts that arent just blatant primary school children, but yes you can find some that are that.

Updated

Cassidy said:

Seriously, the fact that an average user has to put up with both pedoslop edits and moralfagging is a crime.

Both loli and shota should be blacklisted by default according to this post, the "average user" won't even see them unless they purposefully deactivate the filters.

Kisama said:

Both loli and shota should be blacklisted by default according to this post, the "average user" won't even see them unless they purposefully deactivate the filters.

I don't even know where the filters are, and I've seen it on the posts tab. Perhaps it's a tagging thing, but the point stands. New jannies are annoying and stupid.

fkiblaze said:

yea, my understanding of acceptable loli content is the typical "all characters are 18 or older despite appearances", but who knows, maybe they are going by technical terms where it's "actually it's hebephilia!!!" posting since pedo technically refers to prepubescent. That said the moral quality of the picture isnt the same thing as the quality of the edit, so that isn't contradiction.

I'm not trying to say they're the same, I'm just pointing out in tuis case both the aesthetic and moral quality are piss poor. Plus, if what Kisama says is true, then I don't see why anyone wastes their time approving and tagging pictures 99% of users will never see. It's just retarded.

Cassidy said:
I don't see why anyone wastes their time approving and tagging pictures 99% of users will never see. It's just retarded.

I mean 99.9% of people will never even use this site in the first place. Im not sure this place is really designed to do things that is for the majority. Ultimately it just seems the mods just do it as a hobby so they'll approve what they want to take the time to do.

fkiblaze said:

I mean 99.9% of people will never even use this site in the first place. Im not sure this place is really designed to do things that is for the majority. Ultimately it just seems the mods just do it as a hobby so they'll approve what they want to take the time to do.

This site is extremely opinionated, instead of the mods actually walking it through with the users to get approved they put shitty vauge comments under non approved posts. This site isant for people who want to freely express themselves. Its a site for people who just want something to get their dicks off to and when something ruins their fap it gets deleted. I bet over half of them dont make edits or come up with some boring ones. Guys find your efforts elese where. Mods are rude and speak to themselves stroking each others egos. Hopefully someone can make a site that isant as narcissistic as this one.

Kisama said:

Both loli and shota should be blacklisted by default according to this post, the "average user" won't even see them unless they purposefully deactivate the filters.

It's ironic how furry is on the list but not that pedo shits, guess we should add femboys to the default blacklist lol

the_polbwcV2 said:

There is bullshit difference between loli and pedophilia ON THIS WEBSITE

post #78574
post #20504

These comments are just fucking disgusting.
And the post themselves depict small schoolchildren.

I bet my left lung that these kinds of commenters probs want to touch real kids ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€

SumTannDood said:

It's ironic how furry is on the list but not that pedo shits, guess we should add femboys to the default blacklist lol

What's weird is IIRC Danbooru and Gelbooru had those tags blacklisted by default and bunch of sites did the same.

As for the comments, most of them need to have their harddrives checked. Then I saw a post where it was a parody of hentai DVDs with elements of lolicon and they weren't even hiding it...They basically used the words underage and other stuff similar to it and they used characters who clearly looked like children.

somebleacheduser said:

What's weird is IIRC Danbooru and Gelbooru had those tags blacklisted by default and bunch of sites did the same.

As for the comments, most of them need to have their harddrives checked. Then I saw a post where it was a parody of hentai DVDs with elements of lolicon and they weren't even hiding it...They basically used the words underage and other stuff similar to it and they used characters who clearly looked like children.

adding femboys to the default blacklist would be kinda wierd for a porn site, cause you would also have to add yaoi, gay men, since i dont think femboy on female stuff is considered as degenerate. And if you did that that would be wierd since a porn site tends to always have a lot of gay men as users. You would kinda just be trying to make a "Christian" porn site which is a contradiction.

fkiblaze said:

adding femboys to the default blacklist would be kinda wierd for a porn site, cause you would also have to add yaoi, gay men, since i dont think femboy on female stuff is considered as degenerate. And if you did that that would be wierd since a porn site tends to always have a lot of gay men as users. You would kinda just be trying to make a "Christian" porn site which is a contradiction.

Agreed, I rarely see femboy x female stuff, when it comes to femboys: it's either futa, gay, or sissies, always the 3.
Yaoi and gay men has a very questionable fanbase because all of it are fujos, gay porn addicts, and gay fetishizers(man, woman, troon, pooner, etc). Also that's a good contradiction too. A Christian and porn.
>Christian
>Wants to fap to porn but wants to get rid of gay stuff, getting rid of degenerate stuff is understandable.
Also I was referring to how Danbooru and Gelbooru had lolishota, furry(?), ryona blacklisted by default or something even if logged in.
Also you can't bleach furries, mechas, demons, nonhumans; I don't get why it's even included. Also furry on here is not blacklisted yet let me tell you: furries have a history of doing unsavory things and let bad people in their communities (although most communities are like it any way but if you're a furry, you'll get mocked to no end and to living hell)

i should have noted that I thought religious people don't like porn because it's sinful or something

Updated

somebleacheduser said:

Agreed, I rarely see femboy x female stuff, when it comes to femboys: it's either futa, gay, or sissies, always the 3.
Yaoi and gay men has a very questionable fanbase because all of it are fujos, gay porn addicts, and gay fetishizers(man, woman, troon, pooner, etc). Also that's a good contradiction too. A Christian and porn.
>Christian
>Wants to fap to porn but wants to get rid of gay stuff, getting rid of degenerate stuff is understandable.
Also I was referring to how Danbooru and Gelbooru had lolishota, furry(?), ryona blacklisted by default or something even if logged in.
Also you can't bleach furries, mechas, demons, nonhumans; I don't get why it's even included. Also furry on here is not blacklisted yet let me tell you: furries have a history of doing unsavory things and let bad people in their communities (although most communities are like it any way but if you're a furry, you'll get mocked to no end and to living hell)

yea the whole furry trend in hentai in general doesnt have good filters regardless imo. furry tags can include everything from just monster girls to literal bestiality with pokemons and stuff. i doubt any site has a good system in place there.

1 2 3