Your question was why things cost more, so i was going into basic supply and demand of the economy.
Absolutely not, reread it again.
That kinda makes my point stronger. If even the nazis knew what was up in the future plans, then it shows just how easy it was to understand, since they werent necessarily the most knowledgeable of politcal movements. Nazis got a lot of their ideas from other people.
As I said after, the nazis DIDN'T know, it was pure PROPAGANDA to heat people up against France. France was the country with the most black people in all of Europe back then which was shocking for people (there are probably more blacks now in Warszawa than back then in France but still it was shocking for people) that's why they used those posters. Not because they had discovered some sort of secret plan to replace white people.
And what are you trying to say in the second part? Kicking germans out of other countries they conquered and so on is anti-immigration. Yes, after ww2 there was a bunch of deportations, IDK how this related to your point.
We were talking about how immigrants supposedly came for welfare in the 40s-50s-60s as if the politics were the same back then as today, don't play dumb or please read the sentences correctly and in context. Or stop answering because you're making me lose my time.
Old people dont just pop out of nowhere dude. There isnt an ever increasing population of old people when population declines. If you have less kids that means in the future there will also be less old people, not an ever increasing amount. Let me ask you this, how many young people do you think you need to support old people? None of the countries are even at a 1 to 4 ratio yet.
Yes there will also be less old people but it is TOTALLY irrelevant. Why ? Because what matters is the RATIO. And how can you even have written that given you wrote about it at the end of your sentence ? Literally even if the number of old people will be decreasing, the fact is that the ratio of old/young people will keep increasing because of denatality.
The ideal for a country where there would be no immigration nor emigration would be 2.08 children per woman, you can calculate that for the population of your choice.
Think about what you said for a moment. it was possible 60 years ago, but now we need more workforce? Modern societies are actually far more automated than in the past, so we would need less workforce so it technically should be even easier. The reality is different but not because of the impossibility, quite the opposite actually.
It was possible 60 years ago for multiple reasons, one being the fact there were WAY more young people proportionately in the population. And there are multiple factors to take into account, you cannot just say "well technology" and that smh proves your point.
That does not follow. The implication of it being a recent development was to show that genetic modification is not needed to get rid of it as it wasnt the case for most of human history.
You know that evolution can be very quick in certain situations ? It being recent doesn't make it a less dire issue.
Elites arent just one class. There is governing elites, non-governing elites, managerial elites, etc. Most of the indoctrinated college kids become middle managers and managerial elites. They aren't the ones the decide the direction of society, they merely implement the plan. The actual ruling elite don't fall for their own BS and propaganda.
You really think the ruling elite smh secretely is right-wing and knows society is getting destroyed by that ideology ? If that were the case, then they would do EVERYTHING in their power to stop that because it eventually affects them and their children, even if they have money to live in certain places. They are not safe from the consequences of that ideology. And the problem isn't just the elite, the people are responsible as well.
And since when do right wingers not have a positive vision? That has nothing to do with current winning or losing. Right wingers have won in the past many times. In fact, liberalism/leftist has never won a single argument. They win simply by using force. both military and non-military force. In America they won simply by imposing their will through law and the right didnt resist them effectively because they wanted to play fair and obey "rule of law"
Keep being in denial mate, "liberalism/leftist has never won a single argument" still is society not way more far-left as 10-20-50-60 years ago ? Their ideology is insane but the right is co-responsible of that because they do not propose any alternative. Leftists win because lots of people, often the majority, end up agreeing with them. Being a conservative is the most useless thing one can be, because it permits for the frog not to boil too fast so that it remains in the pot and for people to have the illusion of choice. Laws are being imposed because a big minority or majority agree with their ideas. If the right wants to win, the right has to wage the same metapolitical war.
Hubris and if you go down that route the only thing you will create is a human species that is as servile as ants. You arent getting rid of evolution you are just changing the direction humans evolve, as you stated, and that direction will be in a bad direction. If you go 100% into genetic engineering the perfect human that will be created is a sterile ant worker. This is what happens when you give your genetic legacy to other beings. Natural selection is the best for a species, and when you replace it with artificial selection, it then becomes the best for someone else. That's fine when humans want to dominate plants and animals, we can artificially select them to better serve us, not so fine when it's humans you are going to make into a better servant species.
The change didn't even happen yet and you're already pessimistic. LMAO. The change will be for the worst if the right continues being conservative and against technology, because let me tell you the left will have no shame in using transhumanism in their favour. And people will end up accepting it because nobody offers any other alternative for the future that is pro-technology. I am tired of this anti-technology mindset on the right.
Once again, as stated earlier, the nazis werent the ones who came up with most of their ideas. And no, even the nazis accurately showed what was going to happen as it did happen. Propaganda doesnt mean it has to be false. The best propaganda shows the truth.
The best propaganda shows half-truths. Propaganda isn't necessarily false, the propaganda you're talking about though was not some sort of secret knowledge they were trying to reveal to their world, it was to disgust germans of France. It's part of a bigger picture to justify in the minds of germans the war against France.
Also americans didnt want to fight the nazis, did you forget about the whole anti-war movements. FDR had to get the japanese to attack us to make an excuse for the war. The war was communists/globalists vs nationalists. It was Churchill's funders and FDRs war vs nationalism. Doesnt matter if the mass of people were still racist, because once again, they werent the ones who decided on the war. The elites did, hence why u see all those old polls where the ww2 veterens said they would rather lose the war then end segregation and so on.
BRUH, you really believe in what you're saying ? The US LITERALLY was one of the most anti-communist country in the world. The elites in the US were EVIDENTLY white supremacists. Wth are you talking about. If you want one example among so many, even outside of the US and without being a white supremacist, Charles de Gaulle, a well known french resistant that then became a french president famously said that it was good that there were french people of all colours because it showed that France was open, but France is first and foremost a christian country of white race (meaning it's how it's supposed to be and if white people disappear in France, it would be a catastrophe).
And japan having 1 government dude out of a thousand being non-Japanese is not the same as America having the majority being immigrant races. There isnt even a SINGLE WASP on the supreme court in america, let alone a majority of them.
Once again, the future will tell, there's no point in continuing to discuss this point further.
It's out in the open, not a conspiracy. And yes, most of the elites didnt hate us, those elites got replaced. Why did the culture change, it's not just magic/random. People in power changed the culture. And no, just because the plans went back to ww1 doesnt mean the majority of the people in power during ww1 supported it. Those people just slowly got removed from power. As stated, WASPs in power in america got replaced by non-wasps. The Ellis island coalition as it's referred to.
The culture changed because the right stopped waging a metapolitical war and marginalized themselves in conservatism / reactionarism. Universities were a space of free-speech and they were abandoned massively by right-wingers, letting the left get the monopole. And from there there was the slippery slope leading to what we are living through nowadays. Those people didn't get removed from power, the newer generations that replaced the older simply were more left-wing because, once again, the left won the cultural/metapolitical war.
I've never heard of this Ellis Island coalition but I think WASPs got replaced simply because white people went from 90% of the population of the US to less than 60% as of today (if we count illegals and non-whites identifying as white).
Saying AI discovered medicine stuff is like saying the microscope discovered medicine stuff. Ai is a tool people use. The point about the glass of water is that AI isnt that productive currently. That can change, but as it is now, AI making 100 terabytes of anime girl pictures doesn't feed a single person or build a single house.
The point is that AI is advancing rapidly and is already helping scientists to make new discoveries. What's good about AI isn't necessarily productivity (although it will eventually become productive in lots of domains, effectively replacing jobs). The US does have the lead in terms of AI and if you learn a bit more about the potential of AI, you will understand why it's so important.
No they do not need them. Japan has continually improved and has a very affordable cost of living. Japan is probably the overall best country in the world to live in for the median worker. Human greed is just unlimited so they always want more. That doesn't mean they need more.
Japanese people work like slaves, they work so much it's part of the reason why they have so few children. That's why the system still is barely working. I would never in my life want to work in such a country.
It's like discussing the sex of angels, we will never agree, so let's stop discussing that because it feels like we're just losing our time.
Im not talking about the pink haired BLM rioters. Im talking about the elites that decide the policies. Look at what they say when their private conversations are leaked. Like that lefty ex-mayor of new york. Publicly supporting BLM but in private saying how he sends the police to the black areas because they commit all the crime, and so on. Once again, none of the ruling class believe their nonsense. You think hillary clinton went from calling blacks super predators to actually believing they are innocent angels, or joe biden went from calling integrated schools racial jungles, to actually caring about black people?
Some do it out of political strategy of course, but most of it really believes in it imo. And even if they don't fully, they just exaggerate their true beliefs in order to gain more votes.